1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liberstina [14]
2 years ago
7

Portraits. Belinda, a famous portrait painter, agreed to paint Harry's portrait for $5,000. She also agreed to paint the portrai

ts of Michelle's two Welsh Corgi dogs, Baby and Bree. Michelle agreed to pay Belinda $12,000 for the portraits. Belinda charged Michelle more because dogs annoyed her. Belinda met the spoiled dogs, and they really got on her nerves. Plus, she was behind on finishing Harry's portrait. Belinda, therefore, proceeded to assign the right to receive the money for the dog portraits and the duty to paint the dog portraits to her assistant, Fred. He eagerly accepted and painted the portraits. As payment for amounts she owed him for various duties, Belinda also assigned to Fred the right to receive payment from Harry. Neither the contract Belinda had with Harry nor the contract she had with Michelle expressly prohibited assignment or delegation of contractual rights and duties. Belinda finished the portrait of Harry and called him to come and pick it up. Meanwhile, a disgruntled secretary who disliked Belinda told both Michelle and Harry about the agreements with Fred. Michelle was furious and refused to pick up the portrait or pay anyone. Harry likewise refused to pay for his portrait claiming that the right to payment could not be assigned. What would be the most likely result if Fred sues Harry for the $12,000 payment?
A. Fred will lose unless Fred can prove that he was ignorant of the fact that Harry did not want the benefits assigned.
B. Harry will win because the portrait was personal in nature and could not be assigned.
C. Harry will win because he did not expressly agree to the assignment.
D. Fred will win because the right to receive payment could be validly assigned.
E. Fred will win unless Harry can prove that Fred knew that Harry did not want the benefits assigned.
Business
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]2 years ago
7 0

The most likely result if Fred sues Harry for the $12,000 payment is D. Fred will win because the right to receive payment could be validly assigned.

It should be noted that every contract creates its own rights and duties. Based on the information given, the obligee is Belinda.

The obligee in this case transfers the right to receive payments to a third-party who is Fred. Also, from the information, Belinda gave Fred the right to receive the payment from Harry.

Therefore, based on the above information, Fred has the right to receive payment. Therefore, if Fred sues Harry for the $12,000<em> payment</em>, he'll win.

Read related link on:

brainly.com/question/24978955

You might be interested in
Paulis Kennel uses tenant-days as its measure of activity; an animal housed in the kennel for one day is counted as one tenant-d
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

$19,083

Explanation:

Base on the scenario been described in the question, revenue per tenant-day $29.90Total variable expense per tenant-day 20.00 Contribution margin per tenant-day $9.90 Total fixed expense$17,600Net operating income = ($9.90 × 3,400) − $17,600 = $19,083

6 0
3 years ago
What decision rule should be followed when deciding if a business segment should be eliminated?
dusya [7]
Here is the answer of the given question above. The decision rule that should be followed when deciding if a business segment should be eliminated is this: Segments with revenues which are less than avoidable expenses should be considered for elimination. <span>Unavoidable expense are those expense which will continue to be incurred whether segment is continued or discontinued. Hope this helps.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An experienced employee who supervises, coaches, and guides lower-level employees by introducing them to the right people and ge
torisob [31]

Answer:

Mentor

Explanation:

The mentor is the person who has knowledge, experience, skills and he or she is able to guide, motivate, gives the training, supervise the lower skill employees so that they can perfect in their work.

But for motivating, guiding the employees we need to appoint the right people who belong from organizational sponsor so that the lower level employees could able to accomplish their tasks so that the overall objective of the company could be accomplished.

3 0
3 years ago
Westchester Corp. is considering two equally risky, mutually exclusive projects, both of which have normal cash flows. Project A
inn [45]

Answer:

d. If the WACC is 9%, Project B's NPV will be higher than Project A's.

Explanation:

The internal rate of return is the return in which the NPV is zero i.e cash inflows equal to the initial investment

While the WACC refers to the cost of capital by considering the capital structure i.e cost of equity, cost of preferred stock and cost of debt by taking their weightage

Now if the WACC is 9% so project B NPV would be higher as compared to project A as we can see that project B IRR is greater than the project A IRR

Therefore option d is correct

5 0
3 years ago
When people have insurance against a certain event, the notion that those people are less likely to guard against that event occ
sp2606 [1]

Answer: When people have insurance against a certain event, the notion that those people are less likely to guard against that event occurring is called a <u>moral hazard.</u>

Explanation: Moral hazard happens frequently in cases of insurance. If a person has a house, they can decide to install a vault because it reduces the risk of being robbed;

However, when the same person has arranged an insurance that covers the risk of theft of the house, they will have fewer incentives than in the previous situation, to install the security door and ultimately it will be able to increase the probability of the loss in this Theft case. This behavior, for example, before insurance coverage is called moral hazard.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A ________ rate means the value of the currency is fixed relative to a reference currency and then the exchange rate between tha
    12·2 answers
  • An investor contributes $100,000 of cash to a partnership and signs a $200,000 recourse note. During the first year, the investo
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following will most likely give the most assurance concerning the valuation assertion about accounts receivable?A.
    8·1 answer
  • On July 1, based on prior experience, Rocky estimated there is a 40% chance it will earn the bonus for July tours. It guided a t
    7·1 answer
  • 06.06 segment exam A period of economic stability began in the 1980s. In 2001, prices began to increase. In 2007, an economic cr
    6·1 answer
  • On January 1, 20A, two individuals invested $200,000 each to form Reiner Corporation. Reiner had total revenues of $20,000 durin
    11·1 answer
  • Abbott, Inc., issued $50,000 of bonds, paid cash dividends of $8,000, sold long-term investments for $12,000, received $5,000 of
    13·1 answer
  • plies manufacturing overhead at the rate of $40 per machine hour. Budgeted machine hours for the current period were anticipated
    8·1 answer
  • Betty Vinson improperly capitalized line costs at her boss's direction. Which company did she work for
    11·1 answer
  • Assume the following information for Windsor Corp. Accounts receivable (beginning balance) $140,000 Allowance for doubtful accou
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!