1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liberstina [14]
3 years ago
7

Portraits. Belinda, a famous portrait painter, agreed to paint Harry's portrait for $5,000. She also agreed to paint the portrai

ts of Michelle's two Welsh Corgi dogs, Baby and Bree. Michelle agreed to pay Belinda $12,000 for the portraits. Belinda charged Michelle more because dogs annoyed her. Belinda met the spoiled dogs, and they really got on her nerves. Plus, she was behind on finishing Harry's portrait. Belinda, therefore, proceeded to assign the right to receive the money for the dog portraits and the duty to paint the dog portraits to her assistant, Fred. He eagerly accepted and painted the portraits. As payment for amounts she owed him for various duties, Belinda also assigned to Fred the right to receive payment from Harry. Neither the contract Belinda had with Harry nor the contract she had with Michelle expressly prohibited assignment or delegation of contractual rights and duties. Belinda finished the portrait of Harry and called him to come and pick it up. Meanwhile, a disgruntled secretary who disliked Belinda told both Michelle and Harry about the agreements with Fred. Michelle was furious and refused to pick up the portrait or pay anyone. Harry likewise refused to pay for his portrait claiming that the right to payment could not be assigned. What would be the most likely result if Fred sues Harry for the $12,000 payment?
A. Fred will lose unless Fred can prove that he was ignorant of the fact that Harry did not want the benefits assigned.
B. Harry will win because the portrait was personal in nature and could not be assigned.
C. Harry will win because he did not expressly agree to the assignment.
D. Fred will win because the right to receive payment could be validly assigned.
E. Fred will win unless Harry can prove that Fred knew that Harry did not want the benefits assigned.
Business
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
7 0

The most likely result if Fred sues Harry for the $12,000 payment is D. Fred will win because the right to receive payment could be validly assigned.

It should be noted that every contract creates its own rights and duties. Based on the information given, the obligee is Belinda.

The obligee in this case transfers the right to receive payments to a third-party who is Fred. Also, from the information, Belinda gave Fred the right to receive the payment from Harry.

Therefore, based on the above information, Fred has the right to receive payment. Therefore, if Fred sues Harry for the $12,000<em> payment</em>, he'll win.

Read related link on:

brainly.com/question/24978955

You might be interested in
The most recent financial statements for Schenkel Co. are shown here: Income Statement Balance Sheet Sales $ 14,500 Current asse
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

0.1046 or 10.46%

Explanation:

The computation of the sustainable growth rate is shown below:

The Sustainable growth rate of the firm is

= Return on Equity × ( 1 - Dividend Payout Ratio )

where,

Dividend Payout Ratio = 30%

And,

Return on equity is

= Net Income ÷ Shareholder 's equity

= $3660 ÷ $ 24,500

= 0.14938

So,  

Sustainable growth rate is

= 0.14938 × (1 - 30%)

= 0.1046 or 10.46%

8 0
3 years ago
Prior to labor unions, both the employer and employee had the legal right to terminate an employment
Kruka [31]

Before the times of the labor unions, both the employer and the employee reserved the right of employment at will, meaning either one could terminate the agreement at any time and for any reason.

The correct term for the situation proposed in the question is employment at will. The other options describe agreements that have arisen since the creation of the labor unions.

The first option, a closed shop, described an agreement made between the hiring party and the labor unions in which the hiring party agrees to <u>only hire members of the union</u>, while an open shop is just the opposite.

Collective bargaining, on the other hand, is the long process in which the workers of an institution work through their labor unions in order to <u>negotiate contracts </u><u>and the terms of </u><u>employment</u><u>, which include income and benefits. </u>

Therefore the only option that existed prior to the development of labor unions is employment at will, which allowed the termination of a contract at any time for any reason.

To learn more visit:

brainly.com/question/518131?referrer=searchResults

3 0
3 years ago
Mr. Hugh Warner is a very cautious businessman. His supplier offers trade credit terms of 3/19, net 60. Mr. Warner never takes t
vekshin1

Answer:

35.92%

Explanation:

The computation of cost of not taking the cash discount is shown below:-

Discount percentage ÷ (100 - Discount percentage) × (360 ÷ (Full Allowed Payment Days - Discount Days))

= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ (50 - 19)

=  3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ 31

=  0.03093 × 11.61290

= 0.359187

= 35.92%

Therefore for computing Mr. Warner's cost of not taking the cash discount we applied the above formula.

3 0
3 years ago
Le Place has sales of $439,000, depreciation of $32,000, and net working capital of $56,000. The firm has a tax rate of 34 perce
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Sales$439,000

Profit Margin = 6% x $439,000 = $26,340

Tax liability = 34% x $26,340 = $8,956.

Cash flow from operations:

Net income $26,340

Add depreciation $32,000

Deduct net working capital changes -$56,000

Deduct tax liability $8,956

Cash flow from operating activities -$6,616

5 0
3 years ago
"When organizing a meeting agenda, why is it a good idea to discuss old business before introducing new business?"
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

c. It makes sense to complete discussion and reach decisions about old business before tackling new business.

Explanation:

For organizing a meeting agenda first we have to discuss for the old business as it gives the whole picture of the business i.e it is profitable or not that results in increase in sales of the company that reflected completed discussion.

Moreover, the organization also knows how to operates the day to day activities that are related to the functions of management

So it always it is better to make decisions for old business before tackling the new business

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • After 8 years of working for a company that installed underground sprinkling systems for golf courses, Trevor was ready to ventu
    9·1 answer
  • Fern wants to work with a group of experts to find the best solution for a quality assurance problem with her company's new prod
    5·1 answer
  • PackMan Corporation has semiannual bonds outstanding with nine years to maturity and are currently priced at $754.08. If the bon
    15·1 answer
  • If the dollar falls by 20% against the euro and rises by 10% against the yen, which of the following values for European and Jap
    9·1 answer
  • Red Hot Inc. and Maverick Cycles Inc. are two competing motorcycle companies. While Red Hot's Cost of goods sold/Revenue is 63.4
    9·1 answer
  • Gina Robinson, Inc. (GRI) GRI management has decided to reinvent the culture of the organization. Previously, the company tried
    8·1 answer
  • Jamal and Keisha each earn money by washing cars and mowing lawns.
    5·2 answers
  • This company purchased a truck at a cost of $12,000. The truck has an estimated residual value of $2,000 and an estimated life o
    11·1 answer
  • You are analyzing the following four companies based on their debt to equity ratio. which company has the highest risk of insolv
    9·1 answer
  • The first thing you should do when you see your customer/client is outline the plan for the session.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!