Answer:
Continuities in the lives of African Americans in the 19th century: they did not own their own land, they faced support from some white Americans, they faced repression from others, and the government was largely unsuccessful at bringing about meaningful change and full rights for African Americans.
Changes in the lives of African Americans in the 19th century: Reconstruction brought some opening and freedoms initially, there was hope in the first decades after the Civil War, the economic fabric of the southern states began to change with smaller landholdings and the decentralization of the major industries like sugar and cotton.
Explanation:
Continuities: Once freed after the Civil War in the United States, many African Americans sought to reunite their families and to acquire land of their own. However, the promises of "forty acres and a mule" were not a reality for the majoring of former slaves. Ten years after emancipation barely five percent of former slaves in the ex-Confederate states were landowners. Those who did manage to get some land often lacked any means to develop it because there was no access to credit. While there were many white Americans who considered themselves abolitionists and who were against the institution of slavery, both before and after the civil war, there were also white Americans who wanted to continue with the status quo of slavery and separation of white and black communities. The same kind of antagonisms continued both before and after the civil war.
Changes: Reconstruction brought a lot of hope and some new freedoms for African Americans, but soon many of those advances in Reconstruction would be reimplemented in the form of state laws of segregation, especially in the southern states. The economic fabric in the South was changing. Many of the large sugar plantations in Louisiana were broken down into smaller units for example after the Civil War ended, and the cotton monopolies were breaking up, the production and sale becoming increasingly decentralized after the civil war.
The 38th demand or clause basically says that the sovereign's (the king's) power is limited. According to this clause, nobody can be tried without the testimonial of independent witnesses. Until then, the king, as a supreme ruler, could do whatever he wanted, without providing a fair trial for the accused. Therefore, the court should now be independent and free of king's power.
what do you mean like the only thing i know that actually can make sense to that is
The industrial revolution was a time where factories were expanding
Correct answer:
<h2>A. The Declaration of Independence established a new country, while the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen only lists a set of principles.</h2>
America's <em>Declaration of Independence </em>was establishing the new country's break from Great Britain. In France a little more than a decade later, the <em>Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen </em>was a statement of principles as representatives of the people were seeking to reform government under the French monarchy.
Additional historical note:
Your question asked about a difference between the documents. There are also key similarities. One important similarity is that both declarations emphasize that persons have natural rights that are to be preserved and protected. The Scientific Revolution had shown that there are natural laws in place in the physical world and in the universe at large. Applying similar principles to matters like government and society, Enlightenment thinkers believed that using reason will guide us to the best ways to operate politically so we can create the most beneficial conditions for society. The declarations at the heart of the American Revolution and French Revolution both emphasized the natural rights of people.
