D.) He saw the United States as an oppressive, occupying force that was evil and harmful to Islam
Answer:
The colonist organied to carry out the Boston Tea Party
Explanation:
Thankfully this is not true. But here me out. the rain falls on the just and the unjust right? I don't see a cone of light following a virtuous person right in the middle of a rainstorm. By thankfully, i mean we all are wrong. We all do things that we regret, or that we know are wrong, and even some things that we don't know are wrong.
Also, I'm not sure how ruling badly brings a bad name on your ancestors, but if someone said, "Bro, you are ruling awfully man. Your ancestors must've been messed up," then i can see why you could say this. ;), Since you decide what you do, your ancestors probably won't get a bad rep. Your ancestors really don't care at this point what you do. Where they are is not affected by what you do.
If you strive do what is right and honor God, you will indeed be blessed by Him, but there will always be a group that complains or argues to get themselves what they want.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Personal opinions, views, and beliefs can shadow the truth of what actually happened.
---------------
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The question is incomplete without options. These were the views of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist.
The Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay created a government based on federalism to limit the power of the National Government to limit the possibility of governmental abuses of power. Anti-federalists represented Thomas Jefferson were mainly concerned with the rights of individuals and states.
The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay intended to support the ratification of the United States Constitution.
After the Constitution was written, it needed to be ratified by 9 states, those who supported it were the Federalists while those against it were Anti-Federalists and proposed Articles of Confederation. At the conventions in 1789, arguments were canvassed by both different parties.
The Federalists felt the new Constitution was sufficient and therefore did not want a bill of rights. They defended the weakness contained in the Constitution and stated that amendments will be effected if necessary.
The anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights.
The Argument canvassed at the ratification debates by anti-federalists to justify their position was that their position represents the protection of individual liberties, limits must be placed on the power of the federal government.
