What they share the most is the fact that they are Survivors, although they survived quite different experiences, they both managed to stay alive despite all odds. Juliane Koepcke survived a plane crash and eleven days in the Amazon jungle, Bill Garleb was a prisoner in the Philippines during World War II.
Personally, I would choose this topic:Speech related to violence: You might want to write about limitations on freedom of speech related to violence. Speech that incites violence is not covered by the First Amendment and can result in prosecution in the United States. However, speech that merely supports violence as a political option is not considered a crime.
Part A: As this topic is something that is more of a national issue than one within one single school, I would address the letter to a member of congress. Addressing it to anyone else would do little to actually address the issue.
Part B:
Stance: While freedom of speech allows one to express their opinions publicly, those who engage in speech promoting violence, or hate speech, negatively impact society as a whole as well as on an individual level. As such, speech promoting violence should not be considered under the First Amendment, and those individuals who choose to engage in it should be persecuted.
Answer:
I wonder what would have happened of they didnt see the burning church? I haven't read the book in a while lol
The answer to your question is Napoleon is always right. Animal farm is an allegorical novel written by George Orwell. Napoleon is the main villain of animal farm and he is an allegory of Joseph Stalin. Boxer is loyal, kind, hard working and he thinks that every problem can be solved if he works hard. he has been to <span>Stakhanovite movement, which was the movement of hard working people who were thinking the way Boxer thinks. </span>
Answer:
The primary purpose of a conclusion in an informative essay is to
B. refer back to the thesis.
Explanation:
In essay writing, the conclusion is the final paragraph.<u> Its purpose is to refer back to the thesis, that is, to restate what was initially claimed by the author. A conclusion should never present new information, examples, or evidence, otherwise it would not be a conclusion at all, but merely an extension of the essay's body. It should wrap up by once again reaffirming the main idea or topic in a shorter manner, with fewer words. Therefore, the best option for this question is B. refer back to the thesis.</u>