1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8_murik_8 [283]
3 years ago
6

What problems could occur if only one person in town could read?

History
2 answers:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There would be many problems, if only one person in town could read and some of them are as follows: Dependent on only one person for reading. Lower literacy rate of the town. Slow memory enhancement of other people

Explanation:

ddd [48]3 years ago
3 0

Explanation:

  • All people in that town would turn into dependent people causing others to rely on only that one person to solve their problems, such as reading.
  • That person would be left w tasks to complete that others would not be able to do, like read.
You might be interested in
The constitution 's creation of a national government with separation of powers
mote1985 [20]
Separation of powers was made so none of the government branches would abuse their power, they used check and balances to check up on each other
8 0
4 years ago
why Abraham took the long way to the western cities of Shechem, Hebron, and Beersheba instead of just traveling west through the
Ainat [17]

Abraham maybe chose the longer way to get to his desired destinations, but he for sure chose the safer way to them. He chose the longer way because of the harsh conditions of the Arabian desert. It is a vast, hostile desert, where sandstorms are very common and deadly, and food and water are almost impossible to find. Also, on the Arabian Peninsula, in this period of time, there was still and active chain of volcanoes, so traveling through the desert was pretty much suicide.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of these men were assassinated in 1968?
White raven [17]
President JFK were Assassinated in 1968.

please mark me brainliest.
6 0
4 years ago
Why was the Roman Empire divided into the eastern and western Roman Empires in 284 CE?
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

By 285 CE the empire had grown too vast to be ruled from the central government at Rome and so was divided by Emperor Diocletian (r. 284-305 CE) into a Western and an Eastern Empire.

Explanation:

In 285 AD, Emperor Diocletian decided that the Roman Empire was too big to manage. He divided the Empire into two parts, the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire. ... The Western Empire was ruled by Rome, the Eastern Empire was ruled by Constantinople.

6 0
4 years ago
What is the term used to describe people who were unable to find work because they had been accused of communist sympathies
vfiekz [6]

Blacklisted. Hope this helped

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes Spanish Louisiana after the American Revolution? Most African Americans who lived in the region w
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes an economic effect of European imperialism in Africa?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the effect of the influenza virus that developed in the United States in 1918?
    13·2 answers
  • During the Ming dynasty, who were the rulers of China?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following led to the rise of many new kinds of churches in the colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • What happened during the period known as the Restoration?
    8·1 answer
  • Pretend you are a European immigrant in the early 1800s. You have recently arrived in the United States and are about to write y
    9·1 answer
  • The Industrial Revolution started in Great Britain because Great Britain had?
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think the fall of the Berlin Wall was important to the end of the overall Cold War?
    11·1 answer
  • What serves as the overview of the constitution? (nine letters)
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!