Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
The use of terracing to grow crop, Hope This Helps.
The answer is about ninety percent, base on the studies and
researches that is conducted—there is a total of ninety percent when it comes
to the vote with the congress that are passed with the unanimous party line
voting.
Answer:
A) By its actions, the altruist increases the likelihood that some of its genes will be passed on to the next generation.
Explanation:
People who have altruistic behavior tend to be able to form strong personal relationship with other people and make them generally well-liked in a society.
Because of this, they tend to be surrounded by strong groups who are willing to help them in case they are facing any troubles and protect them from danger. This will increase their survivability along with the likelihood that some of its genes will be passed on to the next generation
