The answer is: C
In option A the writer talks about an assertion and in option B he expresses his disagreement with this assertion. <em>In option C, the writer clearly supports the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain.</em> Option D only extends the general idea.
Answer:
How do you respond to the query, "Is cheating ever acceptable? Whether you are the cheater or the one being cheated on may depend. possibly by your own moral compass as well. Some people see cheating as a clear-cut problem, while others see it as having many different shades of gray. These contrasting frames of view can seriously harm any relationship.
It is both ethically and morally debatable whether cheating is ever acceptable. Most people would say "no," it is never okay. How does that account for the ongoing occurrence, then? Is it only erratic impulse control? In many instances, it most certainly is. In other cases, though, people will argue that there are legitimate reasons to go outside the parameters of their relationship. However, are these justifications actually real?.
Answer:
D) "SHS from units or common areas where smoking occurs can seep into smoke free units." Have a Great day:)
Journalists like Edward R. Murrow helped to <span>question accusations of disloyalty. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". The other options can be negated. I hope that this answer has come to your help.</span>
The phrase in this sentence is Nonrestrictive because there can only be one youngest brother, therefor the name Julian does not need to be in the sentence, because it is unnecessary to name him.
Hope this helps! :)
