Answer:
3) Corporations use acquisition as a substitute for innovation.
Explanation:
The fastest way in which a corporation can enter a new market or develop new products is through buying existing companies that already operate in the new target markets or have developed the new products that the corporation wishes to sell.
Research and development is very costly and time consuming, and on many occasions the results aren't even good or are not as good as expected. By acquiring a smaller company that has already developed the product, then the corporation might even save money.
Most potential buyers already have a product that satisfies this need or want.
:33333333333333333333
The statement should be "<span>Not all types of income are taxed; while earned income and passive income are taxed, portfolio income is not taxed."
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer:
The answer is "Option c".
Explanation:
The potential value of horizontal economic fusion would be that the fusion company can generate an economy of scale that may result in lower prices. One of the advantages of vertical fusion is once merging companies possess economies of scale through fusion, enabling them to cut production costs & helping companies to benefit from it.
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.