1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
2 years ago
10

Why did Southern states oppose Hamilton's plan? They were against states' rights. They did not want to have to help pay off othe

r states' debts. They preferred to promote industry over promoting agriculture.
History
2 answers:
timama [110]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

They did not want to have to help pay off other states' debts.

Explanation:

The Southern states oppose Hamilton's plan because "they did not want to have to help pay off other states' debts."

This is because before Alexander Hamilton makes the proposition, the majority of the southern states had actually paid off their wartime debts using their own money.

Thereby many of them believed other states of the United States should also pay their own debt, without assistance from other states.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "They did not want to have to help pay off other states' debts."

Step2247 [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the first one is B and the second one is B

Explanation:

edge 2021

You might be interested in
Why was it wrong for the air traffic controllers to go on strike during the Reagan administration? They did not need higher wage
AleksAgata [21]
Back in 1981, for those of you who remember, August 5 was the day that then-president Ronald Reagan fired more than 11,000 striking air traffic controllers. The air traffic controllers were fired two days after their union, PATCO, declared a strike. They were demanding a pay raise, a shorter workweek, and better working conditions. It was a move that some historians say laid the groundwork for today's assault on labor. Hope that helps, but if not visit this ∨
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/25393-the-consequences-of-reagan-breaking-the-1981-air-traffic-co...
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the 1793 yellow fever epidemic end?
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

mosquitoes breed in stagnant water. in October and November, Frost's came and froze the water and stopped the breeding of infected mosquitoes.

5 0
2 years ago
In Inca society, the Sapa Inca served as
SVEN [57.7K]
The Sapa Inca served as the emperor in Inca society. 
<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me on this question
ra1l [238]

Answer:

hurricane and tornado

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The term coined after the end of ww2 to describe the nazis strategy to exterminate europe jews and other groups is the
Alexandra [31]

Answer:  The HOLOCAUST

Context/details:

The Holocaust is a term used to describe the systematic mass slaughter of European Jews and others in Nazi concentration camps during World War II.

Holocaust" is a term that means "burning the whole thing."  It comes from terms related to burnt offerings of animals in ancient religions. Essentially, the unwanted Jews and others in Germany were treated like animals to be slaughtered.  You can find appearances of the term "holocaust" in use already during World War II, such as the records of Britain's House of Lords in 1943 noting that a member there had asserted that "the Nazis go on killing" and urging some relaxing of immigration rules so that "some hundreds, and possibly a few thousands, might be enabled to escape from this <u>holocaust</u>.”  But the term gained its main currency as historians in the 1950s began to use the term in reference to the Nazi's campaign of genocide.

By the way, the term "genocide" is another that came into use around the same time.  Raphael Lemkin, a Polish legal scholar (of Jewish ethnicity) had been studying the problem of mass killings of a people group since the 1920s, in regard to Turkish slaughter of Armenians in 1915.  He coined the term "genocide" in 1944, in reference also to the Holocaust.  The term uses Greek language roots and means "killing of a race" of people.  Lemkin served as an advisor to Justice Robert Jackson, the lead prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials.  "Crimes against humanity" was the charge used at the Nuremberg trials, since no international legal definition of "genocide" had yet been accepted.  Ultimately, Lemkin was able to persuade the United Nations to accept the definition of genocide and codify it into international law.  

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the relationship between the Industrial
    8·1 answer
  • This is a picture taken during WWII.
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the early history of euthanasia?
    6·1 answer
  • When river waters recede after floods, the uncovered soil is described as?
    13·1 answer
  • What Australia means to you?
    9·2 answers
  • What does a close observation of the painting reveal about<br> the astronomer?
    14·1 answer
  • What is considered the opposite of Democracy?
    10·2 answers
  • How is the rule of law reflected in the headline?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following emerged as
    9·1 answer
  • The ancient greeks considered themselves to be the center of the universe or "the measure of all things," a concept known as?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!