1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
3 years ago
15

Why was there little evidence of the 120,000 people who had been killed at Babi Yar? A. The Nazis built huge ovens to burn the b

odies. B. The bodies had been transported to Siberia afterwards. C. No one was really killed there as the Nazis said. D. The bodies were buried deep into the Russian permafrost.
History
1 answer:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is A) The Nazis built huge ovens to burn the bodies.

The reason why there was little evidence of the 120,000 people who had been killed at Babi Yar was that the Nazis built huge ovens to burn the bodies.

This was another chapter of the many atrocities committed by the Nazi Germans in times of Adolph Hitler.

On September 29, 1941, Hitler ordered to kill more than 30,000 Jewish people in Babi Yar in Kiev, Ukraine. Among the victims, there were men, women, and infants.

The killing continued after that massacre until 1943. To try to hide the evidence, Nazi soldiers tried to burn the bodies in pyres but local people witnessed the action.

You might be interested in
According to his letter, what challenge did truman face when he became president?
olga2289 [7]

When he first became President, the conflict with Japan was still continuing. After the war finished there was trouble in Korea which became an impasse after China move toward in to help North Korea. Obliteration of Europe and Asia that required to be reconstructed. The Russians declined to pull out their troops from Germany and Eastern Europe and remained in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. There were severe labor difficulties in the US Steel industry. The US had to readapt to a peace-time economy and recuperate from the enormous costs of WW II.

5 0
3 years ago
Why was it difficult for Congress to fulfill its duties under the Articles of Confederation? Group of answer choices
nlexa [21]

Answer:

It was difficult for Congress to fulfill its duties under the Articles of Confederation because Congress lacked the power to regulate foreign trade, and most congressional decisions required the approval of at least nine states.

Explanation:

According to the Articles of Confederation, the member states had their own foreign policy and armed forces. Member states also had the right to resign from the Confederacy. Each member state had one vote in the Unicameral Congress. The Congress elected a committee consisting of one representative from each member state to conduct the foreign and security policy. It elected a president from among its members for a year at a time. Congress had little power because it had no taxing power and could not make decisions binding on member states. In nominal terms, Congress had the power to conduct foreign, military and monetary policy, but it could not compel a member state to allocate funds. With the exception of foreign policy, the decisions of the central government were only recommendations which were not binding on the states and for which the central government had no powers, prerogatives or military powers. All major decisions also required the unanimity of the states.

6 0
2 years ago
Difference between act and rule utilitarianism?
vekshin1

1. Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people, while Rule utilitarianism is the belief that the moral correctness of an action depends on the correctness of the rules that allows it to achieve the greatest good.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes the Doctrine of Enlargement
abruzzese [7]
The Doctrine of Enlargement is best described in the following statement: "<span>a foreign policy stance that espouses a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States."</span> 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unlike the settlers at Jamestown, the Plymouth colony was established primarily by Pilgrims who wanted to
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:

Plymouth Colony, America's first permanent Puritan settlement, was established by English Separatist Puritans in December 1620. The Pilgrims left England to seek religious freedom, or simply to find a better life.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the south feel they had the right to withdraw from the union
    7·1 answer
  •      I NEED HELP PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!                                                                  
    13·1 answer
  • 15 POINTS
    10·2 answers
  • What were the "Three Principles of the people"
    13·1 answer
  • How did Hindus and Buddhists look at social class differently
    13·1 answer
  • Describe your feelings about country 'India'.
    8·2 answers
  • !!!ANSWER THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!
    15·2 answers
  • Who is Gladiola? The Lightning Thief Chapter 12
    6·2 answers
  • Anyone know thisss??!??!?
    10·1 answer
  • Harriet Bishop was the first public-school teacher in Minnesota.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!