1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio [31]
1 year ago
5

What are some ways to identify propaganda?

History
1 answer:
RUDIKE [14]1 year ago
5 0

Propaganda's goal is to impose a viewpoint or a concept, and it will achieve this by employing a variety of highly deceptive strategies. Frequently with logical flaws, emotional appeals over ones to reason, and overt prejudice. One of these strategies, for instance, is the false analogy, which is the association of two ideas or occurrences without concrete proof of a cause-and-effect connection. thinking in black and white, when there are only two sides to an issue: "You are either for it or you are against it." Spinning the story is replacing words and phrases having a certain meaning with others that have a similar meaning and alter the audience's perception. Be on the lookout for other tactics, such as whataboutism, name-calling, etc. Once you notice it, what do you do? Check the facts, consult a variety of, ideally independent, news sources from throughout the world, and find out what ordinary people who have little interest in the subject believe. You will discover the truth if you examine the story from several angles.

You might be interested in
What effect did feudalism have on mideval Europe
Lera25 [3.4K]
Sorry the answer took so long -laughs- but it only created a social hierarchy that stood for decades. 
4 0
3 years ago
Write a report on the importance of the Battle of Saratoga
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

you should not ask for a report on brainly my suggestion is find the info and look on google to find the stuff then put it in your own words

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following are tactics that politicians use to raise money? A) fundraising in other countries. B) Dinners, speeches,
lukranit [14]
B I think I'm sorry if its wrong
7 0
3 years ago
How did different religious groups gain protection under Muslim rulers?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

To begin, we need to first grasp the basic terminology relevant to the study of religious minorities. Religious minorities are known as dhimmīs, short for ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, a term that later became synonymous with the People of the Book.[4] The original meaning of al-dhimmah, however, meant protection, and it was often short for dhimmat–Allah wa-rasūlih, or the “protection of God and His Prophet.”[5] In short, the concept originally had a divine connotation, or a meaning that was directly related to the power of God. However, the concept soon morphed into a technical legal term with the progression of classical scholarship, and it consequently lost its transcendent dimension.[6] As a result, ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, has become a legal term and not a reference to the recipients of divine protection. It is important to discuss the etymology of the word because it demonstrates the significance of the people of the dhimmah who, at the very root of it all, are people who were to be protected on behalf of God and His Prophet ﷺ – an immense responsibility. This status is awarded to People of the Book (who according to many scholars includes Zoroastrians and others) who agree through contract to pay the jizyah, or poll-tax, in exchange for that protection.[7] In sum, the formation of the people of the dhimmah was rooted in religious minorities paying a tax that exempted them from military service. Much more nuance can be embedded within all of these terms that are sometimes highly contested among scholars, but considering the limited scope of this paper, we will move forward to address the larger picture at hand.

The power of the Muslim state was dependent on its ability to provide two precious resources to its people: security and justice.[8] Christians and Jews and other minorities were not technically citizens of the Muslim state; they were considered outsiders under the protection of the state, leading to the title of dhimmah, or protected people.[9] Their protection was guaranteed in a number of ways: by providing them with legal autonomy – meaning they could maintain their religious practices without interference – and protection during war. That said, there have no doubt been incidents throughout history in which that protection was threatened or revoked and the Muslim ruler engaged in persecution of religious minorities.[10] The fact remains, however, that there was never widespread systematic persecution of Christians, for example, in the Islamic world as there was in the late Roman Empire.[11] And the hostile circumstances that did occasionally arise, were not due to Islamic legislation per se, but were rather a result of an amalgam of social, political, and economic circumstances. So while Christians historically at times suffered at the hands of Muslims, it was almost never a result of their being Christian, or their beliefs, but a result of various factors related to the pursuit of power.[12]

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did learning about the French Revolution change the way you think about the roles of laws in society
sesenic [268]

Answer:

The French Revolution of 1789 was such an important event, visitors to France’s capital city of Paris often wonder, why can’t they find any trace of the Bastille, the medieval fortress whose storming on 14 July 1789 was the revolution’s most dramatic moment? Determined to destroy what they saw as a symbol of tyranny, the ‘victors of the Bastille’ immediately began demolishing the structure. Even the column in the middle of the busy Place de la Bastille isn’t connected to 1789: it commemorates those who died in another uprising a generation later, the ‘July Revolution’ of 1830.

The legacy of the French Revolution is not found in physical monuments, but in the ideals of liberty, equality and justice that still inspire modern democracies. More ambitious than the American revolutionaries of 1776, the French in 1789 were not just fighting for their own national independence: they wanted to establish principles that would lay the basis for freedom for human beings everywhere. The United States Declaration of Independence briefly mentioned rights to ‘liberty, equality, and the pursuit of happiness’, without explaining what they meant or how they were to be realised. The French ‘Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen’ spelled out the rights that comprised liberty and equality and outlined a system of participatory government that would empower citizens to protect their own rights.

Much more openly than the Americans, the French revolutionaries recognised that the principles of liberty and equality they had articulated posed fundamental questions about such issues as the status of women and the justification of slavery. In France, unlike the US, these questions were debated heatedly and openly. Initially, the revolutionaries decided that ‘nature’ denied women political rights and that ‘imperious necessity’ dictated the maintenance of slavery in France’s overseas colonies, whose 800,000 enslaved labourers outnumbered the 670,000 in the 13 American states in 1789.

As the revolution proceeded, however, its legislators took more radical steps. A law redefining marriage and legalising divorce in 1792 granted women equal rights to sue for separation and child custody; by that time, women had formed their own political clubs, some were openly serving in the French army, and Olympe de Gouges’s eloquent ‘Declaration of the Rights of Woman’ had insisted that they should be allowed to vote and hold office. Women achieved so much influence in the streets of revolutionary Paris that they drove male legislators to try to outlaw their activities. At almost the same time, in 1794, faced with a massive uprising among the enslaved blacks in France’s most valuable Caribbean colony, Saint-Domingue, the French National Convention abolished slavery and made its former victims full citizens. Black men were seated as deputies to the French legislature and, by 1796, the black general Toussaint Louverture was the official commander-in-chief of French forces in Saint-Domingue, which would become the independent nation of Haiti in 1804.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What method did painters<br> use to achieve a realistic<br> style?
    13·2 answers
  • How many casualties in the battle of bull run?
    14·2 answers
  • Farmers established two types of organizations to fight for reform. List one of them here.
    13·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the book of the dead
    14·1 answer
  • Kansas entered the Union as a slave state or free state?
    12·2 answers
  • How did fascism put Europe on the path to war?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the queen of Hawaii yield her authority to the United States?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Spartans create a strict military society? *
    12·1 answer
  • Answer the following questions
    5·2 answers
  • Should all members of the nazi party be held responsible for the holocaust or just nazi leader?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!