Answer:
<
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
p
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, i woudnt reccomend to use integration by parts, becuase you are not simplifying the expression by doing an integration and a derivation. It is not easy to integrate 1/x³+1, and if you derivate it, then a natural logarithm would appear, and the integral wont be easier after this parts step.
It is a better idea to use integration by substitution. Note that if you replace x³+1 by a variable y, we have that dy = 3x² dx. We can easily make a 3xdx appear in the integral by multiplying and dividing by 3, solving the integral easily:

(Note that, if x ranges from 0 to 1, then u = x³+1 ranges from 0³+1 = 1 to 1³+1 = 2)
The -4 will translate the graph of f(x) 4 units to the right.
Then the -2 before the x will stretch it vertically with factor 2, then reflect it in the y -axis.
Finally the + 5 will translate the graph 5 units vertically upwards