1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
3 years ago
13

“Explain how the treatment of COs was different in the First World War compared to the Second World War

History
1 answer:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In the First World War, those who refused to fight in the conflict – known as conscientious objectors (COs) – were often treated harshly and vilified. These attitudes softened, however, over the course of the 20th century. Today their stories are beginning to be integrated into what we know about Britain during the First World War.

Explanation:

I THINK ITS HELP GOOD LUCK

You might be interested in
HELP ASAP!!!!!!
olasank [31]

Answer:

I thin that it would be, C. They could not testify in court to defend themselves against a

crime.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the United States us chemical warfare during the Vietnam War?
Y_Kistochka [10]
To give them an advantage on the enemy
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. It was established by President Barack Obama. B. It makes it easier for all Americans to access health care. C. It was part o
Natali [406]

Answer:

B and it will be B just trust

8 0
3 years ago
What was the name given to German settlers who are excellent producers of silk
Anestetic [448]

What are the choices?

4 0
3 years ago
Read the paragraph from History of the United States, by Charles and Mary Beard.
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

A). The new immigrants met different conditions when they arrived. Because most found work in factories, they tended to settle in cities, where they lived in crowded neighborhoods with others from their home countries.

Explanation:

The given paragraph would be considered biased as it involves the author's personal remark over opinions(as reflected by the use of descriptive words like 'diverted', 'preserved', 'crowded', etc.).

As per the question, option A best summarizes the paragraph objectively as it aims to factually and logically describe the events without inclusion of personal opinions, thoughts, or emotions while relating the events. Therefore, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After Lincoln won the 1860 presidential election, this event happened next
    13·1 answer
  • Was the first major mexican-cuban crisis. was a direct attempt by the united states to remove fidel castro from power. was a dir
    11·1 answer
  • What role did the korean war play in the cold war
    11·2 answers
  • Radical Republicans Requirements for Reconstruction
    10·1 answer
  • Businesses play a role in the circular flow of goods by:
    14·1 answer
  • What countries were involved in the battle on Battle of Britain WWII
    12·2 answers
  • Please help!!
    15·1 answer
  • A political system in which power is exercised by representative institutions that are limited by the rule of law.
    5·1 answer
  • Who proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
    14·2 answers
  • The scramble for Africa commonlit how does the author use paragraph 9 to refine their ideas
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!