Answer:
Yes, it's correct
Explanation:
The nonsmokers have the right to tell smokers not to pollute their air, it follows that people who don’t own cars have the right to tell car owners not to drive, because the air from smokers (tobaco, etc.) can create bad impacts on others' health and if the car owners do not know how to drive and still drive their cars carelessly, it will cause the traffic accidents. So, you do not need to own any cars to have the right to tell car owners not to drive.
Answer:
D. Children are in danger because of the road conditions on Green Street.
Explanation:
An inference is a conclusion made based on pieces of evidence and reasoning. When we're reading a text, we can make various inferences based on the details we're offered. Not all information is presented explicitly, which is why this process is very important. That is the only way we will fully understand the text.
Based on the text you were given, we can conclude that children are in danger because of the road conditions on Green Street. We're told about how close to children cars and trucks are and how lucky we are that the number of accidents is relatively low. These are the details that lead us to this conclusion. This is why option D is the correct one.
The rest of the options aren't supported by details offered in the text, which is why they are incorrect.
C. Neutral
Nowadays there are many that are argumentative but they are not supposed to be like that.
I bet you, you can prob find the answer on google