Answer: quoting.
The best method for incorporating evidence in this case would be quoting. This is because the original text is easily accessible, and because, if the reader were to question your argument, he would be able to easily compare your analysis with the text. Moreover, your claim refers to the use of language in the book, which does not require secondary sources in order to be interpreted.
Answer:
1. Cheetah
113 km/hr (70 mph)
They can accelerate from 0 - 60 mph in only 3 seconds.
2. Pronghorn Antelope
98 km/hr (61 mph)
They have a large heart and lungs which help them to go so fast.
3. Springbok
90 km/hr (56 mph)
They are extremely agile animals, they can leap 4 m into the air and jump up to 15 m in length.
4. Quarterhorse
88.5 km/hr (55 mph)
They excel at sprinting short distances.
5 = Thomson's Gazelle
80 km/hr (50 mph)
They have the ability to out last cheetah's in long chases and they can make swifter turns.
5 = Blue Wildebeest
80 km/hr (50 mph)
In order to defend themselves from predators, they run in large herds.
5 = Lion
80 km/hr (50 mph)
When hunting they combine stealth with bursts of speed.
8 = Elk
72 km/hr (45 mph)
They can outrun their main predators, grey wolves, coyotes and dogs.
8 = African Wild Dog
72 km/hr (45 mph)
They are endurance runners and they can achieve an average speed of 48 km/hr (30 mph) over a distance of 4.8 km (3 miles).
10. Coyote
69 km/hr (43 mph)
They use their speed to hunt rabbits, mice, squirrels and livestock.
Explanation:
Answer:
write a letter to the district director of your district telling him about two challenge you face in the school
I inferred you are referring to this excerpt from the text;
"Most people measure their happiness in terms of physical pleasure and material possession. Could they win some visible goal which they have set on the horizon, how happy they could be! Lacking this gift or that circumstance, they would be miserable. If happiness is to be so measured, I who cannot hear or see have every reason to sit in a corner with folded hands and weep. If I am happy in spite of my deprivations, if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life, — if, in short, I am an optimist, my testimony to the creed of optimism is worth hearing."
<u>Explanation</u>:
The author here uses her personal experience of been deaf-blind to assert that an individual's happiness is not dependent on his or her circumstances. Helen says "I who cannot hear or see...I am happy in spite of my deprivations if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life."
We notice her use of convincing language such as when she says "my testimony to the creed of optimism is worth hearing", this language gives her message a convincing feel.
Simple and direct, kind of like it sounds. Short and to the point.
Hope this helped!
