1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
3 years ago
8

Forty years after his conviction, Fred Korematsu once again decided to challenge it. Korematsu's conviction was overturned by th

e United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the same Court that had originally convicted him. The case was heard as a corum nobis case. A writ of corum nobis is a remedy used only in special circumstances to correct errors in a criminal conviction.
The court ruled that newly uncovered evidence revealed the existence of a manifest injustice which—had it been known at the time—would likely have changed the Supreme Court's decision. The decision rested on a series of documents recovered from the National Archives showing that the government had withheld important and relevant information from the Supreme Court that demonstrated that the Army had altered evidence to make it appear that Japanese Americans posed a greater threat of spying and disloyalty.



It is important to note that the corum nobis decision overturned Korematsu's conviction based on the faulty evidence, but did not overturn the constitutionality of the Supreme Court's decision. Why do you think the District Court did this? What do you think the Supreme Court should do with the evidence that showed what the Army did to the Japanese Americans living there during WWII?
History
1 answer:
trasher [3.6K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: About 10 weeks after the U.S. entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942 signed Executive Order 9066. The order authorized the Secretary of War and the armed forces to remove people of Japanese ancestry from what they designated as military areas and surrounding communities in the United States. These areas were legally off limits to Japanese aliens and Japanese-American citizens.

The order set in motion the mass transportation and relocation of more than 120,000 Japanese people to sites the government called detention camps that were set up and occupied in about 14 weeks. Most of the people who were relocated lived on the West Coast and two-thirds were American citizens. In accordance with the order, the military transported them to some 26 sites in seven western states, including remote locations in Washington, Idaho, Utah, and Arizona.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why were the ideals of liberty not extended to African Americans ?
GarryVolchara [31]
At specific points in historical time periods, African Americans were seen merely as work objects. African Americans were seen as 3/4th of a person, a little more a little less. These ideald were not extended to them for others believed they were not "humans" and other unsatisfying terms.
7 0
3 years ago
The naval blockade of the south was designed to prevent?
kumpel [21]
The blockade was supposed to prevent the South from getting resources and support from other countries who would support it such as those in Europe who were ready to recognize it as independent and help it if it meant that in the long run it would help them by weakening the Union.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What event helped General James Wolfe earn a victory in Quebec?
rewona [7]

Answer:General Wolfe had soldiers on both land and water to take defeat the French

Explanation:

On September 13, 1759, the British under General James Wolfe (1727-59) achieved a dramatic victory when they scaled the cliffs over the city of Quebec to defeat French forces under Louis-Joseph de Montcalm on the Plains of Abraham (an area named for the farmer who owned the land

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the United States establish the Monroe Doctrine? The U.S. was concerned that Europeans would regain colonies in Latin Am
Ad libitum [116K]
The correct answer is the first statement about the concern that the Europeans would regain colonies in Latin America. The New World was trying to keep control over it's new found freedom and felt that if the European countries were to gain any more control in the vicinity it would challenge their power.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
20pts. this is for a semester test pls help!! Specialization in American Colonies Colonies Climate Output Specialization New Eng
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

Hello!! the answer is B, hope that helped I took the test and got It right!:)

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose for "checks and balances" in the government?
    15·2 answers
  • What are the expressed and implied powers of the president
    5·1 answer
  • Lions know they are trespassing on another pride's teritory when?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following contributed to an increase in world population in the 20th century?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the colonies not utilize the English common law practice of primogeniture during the 1600s and then begin practicing it
    6·1 answer
  • What is the Eighth amendment
    8·2 answers
  • The main point of Hebrews was too keep the Jews from going back to Judaism.<br> True or False
    9·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP FAST 25? POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
    5·2 answers
  • *
    9·1 answer
  • 3. Why did the Nazis target homosexuals and people who were mentally deficient, mentally ill, physically disabled, or incurably
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!