I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
True, the answer is in the text.
<span>"Revenue sharing is collecting taxes at the local level and distributing them at the federal level."
Revenue sharing.
There's multiple stories online that talks about the government sharing money with local areas to help.
</span>
Because the icons were visually appealing, making them more interesting to people
The Enlightenment<span> (also known as the </span>Age of Enlightenment<span> or the </span>Age of Reason). <span>was an intellectual and philosophical movement which overthrew the world of ideas in Europe during the 18th century.</span>
