Answer:
Hi there!
I might be able to help you!
It is NOT a function.
<u>Determining whether a relation is a function on a graph is relatively easy by using the vertical line test. If a vertical line crosses the relation on the graph only once in all locations, the relation is a function. However, if a vertical line crosses the relation more than once, the relation is not a function</u>. <u>X = y2 would be a sideways parabola and therefore not a function.</u> Good test for function: Vertical Line test. If a vertical line passes through two points on the graph of a relation, it is <em>not </em>a function. A relation which is not a function. The x-intercept of a function is calculated by substituting the value of f(x) as zero. Similarly, the y-intercept of a function is calculated by substituting the value of x as zero. The slope of a linear function is calculated by rearranging the equation to its general form, f(x) = mx + c; where m is the slope.
A relation that is not a function
As we can see duplication in X-values with different y-values, then this relation is not a function.
A relation that is a function
As every value of X is different and is associated with only one value of y, this relation is a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
It's up there!
God bless you!
Answer:
true
Step-by-step explanation:
Answers:
1) Given
2) angle 2 ** see note below
3) angle 3 ** see note below
4) converse of alternate exterior angle theorem
note: you can swap the answers for 2 and 3 and it doesn't matter
========================================================
Explanations:
1) This is given so we just simply state "given". It seems silly to repeat what is given, but this is how you start any geometry proof.
2 & 3) The answers here are angle 2 and angle 3 because they are both interior angles (on the inside of the parallel lines m and L) and they are on alternate sides of the transversal line q. So they are both alternate interior angles and are congruent due to line L parallel to line m (alternate interior angle theorem)
4) If you have a pair of parallel lines, then the alternate exterior angle theorem says that alternate exterior angles are congruent. Going in reverse, the converse of this theorem says that having a pair of congruent alternate exterior angles (angle 1, angle 2) leads to the lines being parallel (p and q).
gosh thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Step-by-step explanation:
awesome please check out my newest question I need help!!!!!!!
The gym teacher has $250 to spend on volleyball equipment. She buys 4 volleyball nets for $28 each. Volleyballs cost $7 each. How many volley balls can she buy
Answer:
she can buy maximum of 19 balls.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of volleyballs be x
we know that
so substituting the values,
