1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marta [7]
3 years ago
8

Explain Brutus's reasons for killing Caesar in the speech in the second scene, and how he persuades the audience to sympathize w

ith his reasons. Cite evidence in you answer
English
1 answer:
Valentin [98]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In the speech, Brutus tries to convince the audience that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome and its citizens.

Explanation:

  Brutus appeals to the feelings of the crowd and even questions them because of their pride in being Roman.

What he seeks is to persuade the crowd, and this way not to be judged for having risen up against Caesar and to have betrayed him for being so close to him. That is why he tells his listeners that his reasons were honorable and that he did it exclusively for all of them.

He tries to show that what he did was for the good of the people and that anyone who wants to judge him would be admitting in some way that they feel like a slave.

Here we can see Brutus using Pathos, by going to the emotions of his audience to achieve his goal.

You might be interested in
What was the outcome of Brown v. Board of Education?
solong [7]
The answer is A) schools were desegregated in the <u />US
6 0
3 years ago
What idea is related in both excerpts?
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a story that contains the following sentence.
beks73 [17]
Just read about a time in your life that he regretted saying something to a friend or family member
3 0
2 years ago
1. The pitcher, cradling the baseball in his mitt, sized up the young batter at the plate. Which of the following statements abo
Orlov [11]
<span>The statement about the sentence that is true is B. the sentence needs commas because the participial phrase is nonsessential. Nonessential phrases, unlike essential ones, are not that important in a sentence, and can thus be easily removed without changing the meaning of the sentence drastically. They are always set off from the rest of the sentence by commas, whereas essential phrases don't have commas around them. Here, the nonessential phrase is cradling the baseball in his mitt.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. The rich people
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

I believe it would be hire, and honest.

Explanation:

Rich people have the money to hire poor people, and the poorest of the poor people become honest

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A semicolon can NEVER be used . . .
    13·1 answer
  • Use contrarily in a sentence
    12·1 answer
  • The prefix which means into is _____.<br> un<br> ir<br> in
    9·2 answers
  • Which conjunction best connects the subjects in the sentence?
    6·1 answer
  • In "The Battle of Blenheim" by Robert Southey, what is the effect of Kaspar's matter-of-fact tone as he describes the results of
    13·1 answer
  • Write the equation of the line that passes<br>through the point (-1,-4) and has a slope<br>of 7.​
    14·1 answer
  • Although publicly the mayor spoke ______ of his town, in private, he was less ______ , pointing out the many difficulties it had
    8·1 answer
  • 7. Which of these statements would work as a claim in a comparative literature essay?
    10·1 answer
  • Pretend you went to your favourite fast food restaurant and while there you received poor service.
    15·1 answer
  • Q 1 Define prepositions and their types ? ​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!