All categories

3 years ago

1.what is definition and

Mathematics

1 answer:

lorasvet [3.4K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1..ans- kite is a quadrilateral in which two disjoint pairs of consecutive sides are congruent (“disjoint pairs” means that one side can't be used in both pairs). ... The opposite angles at the endpoints of the cross diagonal are congruent (angle J and angle L).

You might be interested in

Multiply (x + 1)³

nlexa [21]

Answer:

x³+3x²+3x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

=(x+1)(x+1)(x+1)

=(x+1)(x²+x+x+1)

=(x+1)(x²+2x+1)

=(x³+2x²+x+x²+2x+1)

=x³+3x²+3x+1

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is the equation y=9x linear

ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

Linear

Step-by-step explanation:

A linear equation is an equation of a straight line, which means that the degree of a linear equation must be 0 or 1 for each of its variables. In this case, the degree of variable y is 1 and the degree of variable x is 1 .

Linear

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A manufacturer uses production method to produce steel rods. A random sample of 17 steel rods resulted in lengths with a standar

Arisa [49]

Answer:

$\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87$

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates $\alpha/2 =0.05$ of the area on each tail and we got:

$\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962$

$\chi^2_{crit}=26.296$

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

$p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92$

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Data provided

$n=17$ represent the sample selected

$\alpha=0.1$ represent the significance

$s^2 =4.7^2 =22.09$ represent the sample variance

$\sigma^2_0 =3.5^2 =12.15$ represent the value to check

Null and alternative hypothesis

We want to verify if the new production method has lengths with a standard deviation different from 3.5 cm, so the system of hypothesis would be:

Null Hypothesis: $\sigma^2 = 12.15$

Alternative hypothesis: $\sigma^2 \neq 12.15$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$\chi^2 =\frac{n-1}{\sigma^2_0} s^2$

The degrees of freedom are:

$df =n-1= 17-1=16$

$\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87$

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates $\alpha/2 =0.05$ of the area on each tail and we got:

$\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962$

$\chi^2_{crit}=26.296$

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

$p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92$

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

7 0

3 years ago

You eat 2/3 of your pizza and you have 4 slices leftover. How many slices did you originally order? Write and solve an equation

avanturin [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 × 3 = 12

3/3 = 12

2/3 = 8

1/3 = 4

8 slices were eaten and 4 are left, and if you add 8 + 4 or you multiply the 3 × 4, you get 12. There were originally 12 slices.

5 0

2 years ago

Look at the picture and answer correctly so i can mark you as brainliest.

vodomira [7]

Answer:

{-8, 4, 11}

Step-by-step explanation:

Domain is the x value and the numbers have to be in order! Srry but I gtg now :(

6 0

3 years ago