I don’t understand your question sorry
You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
Answer: how long does it need to be? for test evidence provide quotes that are included through that article or story
Explanation:
Childern learn language before they learn culture
D. copy it directly from the text. is your best answer.
As you are providing textual evidence, it is best to use a direct quote that would support your argument.
~
