Answer:
These lines reveal Silas as a quiter and unfaithful, careless and with a false pride.
Explanation:
The plot is supported as he is found asleep beside the stove, he comes back when he needs money for tobacco in the winter when Warren and Mary don't need the help, but when they do need help Silas leaves, so Warren is done, disappointed, frustrated, Silas is taking advantage of him, and Warren doesn't care if he's young or old-he didn't do his job and that's all that matters.
Mary doesn't want to hurt Silas' feelings, but Warren knows that Silas needs to learn a lesson, and Mary and Warren don't just have the extra money to give Silas.
I’m assuming annie is a female and justine is a male
This means anne uses she/her while justine uses she/her aswell based on the names
Anne told justine that SHE would knit a blanket for HER
Hope this helps!
Chau wants to teach her audience about the features of green, black and white tea. She will most likely be using <u>comparative organizational pattern.</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
There are types of organizational patterns available to use-
- Chronological- It is in which the main points are conveyed based upon the time they occurred.
- Topical- It is created around the main points and sub-points.
- Comparative- It deliberates the similarities and differences between two or more things.
- Spatial- It is the right way to convey key ideas.
- Problem-Solution- It is used when the speaker wants to persuade the audience as they have to take part in solving several problems.
- Causal- It informs the audience about the causes and effects that have occurred.
<u />
<u />
It is so because to examine the alikeness or differences between any two things, a comparative organizational pattern has to be utilize. As in comparative speeches, speakers may look at things in a diverse/different way.
Therefore, a comparative speech outlines the eastern and the western societies which could resemble this.
To learn more about comparative organizational pattern here
brainly.com/question/13718850
#SPJ4
No, they are not equivalent fractions. 200/100 is an improper fraction, meaning that the numerator(or the top number) is larger than the denominator(the bottom number). 1/5 is a normal, simplified fraction...200/100 at its simplest is 2/1. Therefore, like I said before, they are not equivalent
