HEY CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHO IS Adolf Hitler AND WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF HIM??? IN UR OWN WORDS PLS

2 answers:

8 0

Answer: Adolf Hitler was an Austrian-born German politician, Adolf Hitler was the leader of the Nazi party. which killed more than 50 million people.

Adolf Hitler started world war ll causing more than 50 million people killed.

he is not important hes a monster basically

Trava [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Adolf HItler was a very important man in terms of global history, his actions and decisions helped shape our modern world and his achievements will never be forgotten, some of said achievements include feats such as, ordering the deaths of around 6 million jewish people in an extremely innovative fashion, and well as helping cause the deaths of 10 of millions more, he helped ignite the second world war which left many parts of europe destroyed and helped reshape the global map with germany's defeat. some other events connected to his actions were also the development of the first nuclear bomb and many other inventions. In conclusion Adolf Hitler was an extremely important figure who helped change the course of human history.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Between 1805 and 1807, Napoleon defeated armies from all of the following countries EXCEPT:

Andrew [12]

List the options that go here

5 0

4 years ago

In world war 1 who did the central powers include

Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

germany, austra- hungary, ottoman empire and Bulgaria

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which form of government, practiced in certain Greek city-states, describes rule by an individual who assumes absolute power by

Andrei [34K]

It would be an "authoritarian form of government" that forms when an individual assumes absolute power by seizing control illegally, <span>often with the support of the lower classes, since this usually occurs when there is a power vacuum. </span>

7 0

4 years ago

Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise

Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Judicial restraint

Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities; it is the opposite of judicial activism. Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis; a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; and a tendency to deliver narrowly tailored verdicts, avoiding "unnecessary resolution of broad questions."

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Which branch of government decides the meaning of the laws?

Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

D. The Judicial Branch

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers