Answer:reversed and remanded
Explanation:
- In the drunk driving case
- judge discovered and concluded that they had no obligation to volunteer helping the person whose injury they were not responsible for and did not have an hand or part that they played in causing such an injury.
Plaintiff appealed
- Appellate or appeal court established that there was enough evidence for a jury to find defendants liable for negligence because they had aided & abetted Mairs' wrongful post-accident conduct by not acting reasonably under the circumstances to assist Podias, such as calling 911.
They should have foreseen this danger because:
(1) there is a risk of harm that may result from leaving lying in the middle of the road knowing that someone is incapable of helping themselves.
(2) failure of defendants to call for help or take measures that will help the plaintiff.
(3) if one is aware of all the risks and damage that will result from their inability to take action that will help they are liable for the harm caused .
Reversed means that a decision taken by the lower court is not accepted by a higher court .
Remanded means the higher court send back the case that they reject to the lower court to be continued further.
Two the answer is the second one
Spanish and French colonist were olny going to the americas for fur trads,gold and silver. England went there to get religious freedom and land.
The question simply reinforced what Angelica already had come to learn about herself as being too poor to attend <span>college.
Rather than suggesting to Angelica to move into a cheaper school, the more efficient option would be by providing Angelica with several programs that could help her reducing the cost of her college (scholarships)</span>
Helped them calculate the flood.
