1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
3 years ago
15

examine figure 2. the maxim gun was one of the first machine guns invented, and WWI was the first war to be fought using machine

guns. what effects do you think the use of maxim gun in WWI had on the number of casualties (deaths and injuries) ?

History
1 answer:
Natali5045456 [20]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Maxim Gun had taken an extreme toll of casualties due to the way of warfare during World War One. As waves upon waves of soldiers would attack the other sides trench, the Maxim Gun had kept the aggressors in bay. Not like a conventional rifle with one shot then cocking your gun, the Maximum Gun had sprayed bullets everywhere it aimed taking down a vast amount of soldiers. This gun was revolutionary as it was the first fully automatic weapon.

You might be interested in
Please Help.
Mila [183]
The correct answer is D. The Quartering Act<span />
3 0
3 years ago
According to President Wilson, how should the Senate function?
ahrayia [7]
The Senate should be more measured in its thinking of the house
6 0
3 years ago
What where characteristics of the Roman republic
Bumek [7]
In Roman<span> society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the </span>Roman Republic<span>. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the US government think internment camps were necessary during World War II?
Ivan
<span>They were reacting to specific reports of evidence of Japanese espionage activity.

</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the most important way that the USA at the end of 1945 was different from the USA in 1939?
ycow [4]

Answer:

The USA were more so ideologically driven by 1945.

Explanation:

In 1939, the USA and USSR, alongside other powers (ie. Great Britain), were united against a common enemy: Adolf Hitler. This incentivised all countries to put their differences aside and unite against Hitler, in order to end the rule of one of the largest threats of the 20th century. Thus, in 1939, the USA were largely cooperative and cordial.

By 1945, once Hitler and the Nazis’ rule was over, albeit the USA attempted to keep strong ties with countries such as the USSR (seen with US President Roosevelt’s friendship with USSR leader Joseph Stalin), ultimately, USA’s next steps were becoming increasingly dependent on the USA’s ideological differences to that of the USSR, bearing in mind the USA were capitalist and the USSR were communist/ Marxist- Leninist. This is evidenced with Truman (Roosevelt’s successor as US President)’s approach to the USSR at the Potsdam conference from the 17th July- 2nd August 1945.

Hope this helps! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone answer this question about the holocaust
    10·1 answer
  • How does human error change the way that humans complete research and other activities?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the foriegn-born population<br> Of Michigan in 1910
    12·1 answer
  • Analyze how humans in North America have affected their environment.
    5·1 answer
  • How did people in the Middle colonies make money?
    15·1 answer
  • How many years ago is 1750 B.C. If the current year is 2008?
    14·2 answers
  • How old is the federal government<br><br>​
    7·2 answers
  • What was the relationship between sub-Saharan Africa's trade routes and Saharan Africa's trade routes?
    10·1 answer
  • Read the following sentence from the passage: "Many people couldn't resist the larger portion sizes and had included more fries,
    11·2 answers
  • The state in which there was constant rebellion during Philip II's reign was.....
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!