Answer:
4 BAM EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Hello. You forgot to add the text to which this question refers. The text is:
Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. Following the idea of popular rule to its logical conclusion, Pennsylvania created a state government with several distinctive features. First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office. This was a dramatic expansion of who was considered a political person, but other aspects of the new state government were even more radical. Pennsylvania also became a "unicameral" government where the legislature only had one body. Furthermore, the office of the governor was entirely eliminated. Radicals in Pennsylvania observed that the governor was really just like a small-scale king and that an upper legislative body (like the House of Lords in Parliament) was supposed to represent wealthy men and aristocrats. Rather than continue those forms of government, the Pennsylvania constitution decided that "the people" could rule most effectively through a single body with complete legislative power.
Answer:
The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
Explanation:
The text above shows how Pennsylvania created a constitution a totally different and radical constitution compared to other American states. This is because Pennsylvania, through its constitution, modified its entire political body, creating a more popular structure and accessible to all citizens. The main changes occurred in terms of who could vote and stand and how the state's legislative body would be established. In summary, these changes are:
- The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
- The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
Answer:
These colonies were also different. There was <u>more religious freedom in the Middle colonies</u> than in the New England colonies. This was especially true in Pennsylvania. The <u>Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves</u>. This is true because there was <u>more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming</u>. Thus, another difference is the <u>kind of farming</u> done. In the <u>New England colonies</u>, <u>subsistence farming was practiced</u>. These<u> farmers grew enough for their family, but didn’t have too much left to sell to other people</u>. In the <u>Middle colonies, farmers grew crops for sale</u>. The main cash crop was wheat.
Their rights were to:
Hold office.
Own property.
Vote.
Defend in court.
Pass laws.
Chose officials.
Their responsibilities were:
Jury duty.
Fight when needed.
Soldiers.
Taxes.
Serve in government.
Answer:
Which European countries established strong centralized monarchies during the late Middle Ages? Aragon, Castile, under Isabella and Ferdinand's rule established a strong centralized monarchy.
Hope It Helps..
Explanation:
Pls Mark As Brainliest
