Yup that’s right z’n:)
H ,hm7;’my gngngntnybtbtn
Hamilton wanted a new national government that had completed political authority. He just like to state government I believe that they should be eliminated entirely. In fact, Hamilton believed that the perfect union would be one in which there was no states at all. At the same time, however, Hamilton realized that illuminating the states was impossible, at least at the Philadelphia convention, because there were too many other Americans who favorite the rights of the state over the states national government.
Hamilton drafted a proposal for a new national government that would centralize power but still allow states to retain many of the right and individually.
<span>Genetics.
Gregor Mendel is considered the "father of genetics" in modern science. Johann Mendel (his birth name) graduated from the Philosophical Institute at the University of Olmütz in 1843. Then he decided to become a monk, joining the Augustinian order at the St. Thomas Monastery in Brno (in the Austrian empire). As a monk, he was given the name Gregor.
He continued his studies in the sciences at the University of Vienna, his studies funded by the monastery. Around 1854, Mendel began experimenting with plants in the monastery's garden, especially exploring the transmission of hereditary traits in plant hybrids.
From his experiments with pea plants, he proposed basic laws of genetics such as the Law of Segregation (that there are dominant and recessive traits which are passed on from parent to offspring), and the Law of Independent Assortment (that individual traits were transmitted from parent to offspring independently of other traits).</span>
Andrew jackson describe the election of 1824 as a corrupt bargain because he thought south carolina voted for John Quincy adams in order to make it easier to Secede.
Back then, John Quincy simply doesn't have enough vote to be considered as the winning candidate, making the credibility of the election really questionable
hope this helps
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The most valid counter-argument to the description of the Mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols were interested only in plunder and treasure but not in controlling the Russian territory.
As we know by reading this part of history, the Mongols were terrible warriors that showed no mercy. They were fierce fighters that indeed were interested in destroying and plunder. And more than conquering and establish a form of government to rule a territory, by the way, they attacked and proceeded, it seemed that they were more interested in becoming wealthy.
