An example of politicians' deliberate slanting of facts is: C. the claim that free trade is the cause for the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs.
In English language, a fact is an evidential information provided about a specific event, topic, or subject matter in its actual and true conditions.
This ultimately implies that, a fact clearly and concisely presents the fundamental reality of a thing (subject) based on an empirical study and/or objective consensus.
Slanting of facts refers to an act in which a speaker or writer includes his or her biased ideas or opinions when presenting a fact to an audience. Thus, it typically involves selecting facts that essentially favors your bias while discrediting the true situation of things.
In this context, the claim that free trade is the cause for the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs is an example of politicians' deliberate slanting of facts because is more likely to open up a country's economy for increased trade and by extension creating more employment opportunities in the manufacturing sector.
Find more information: brainly.com/question/11428078
Answer:
To improve document
Explanation:
Revising a summary might be beneficial if you want to search for errors you may have missed the first time. If you avoid grammatical and spelling errors, your document seems more professional. Also, another individual may provide additional words or phrases that are better than some in order to improve the appearance.
The correct answer is B. The students did the experiment in the lab on Wednesday.
All other possible answers keep it in the passive form, only B is active.
<span>D) presents the information in a difficult way......
</span>
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
