Answer: $155,520
Explanation:
Pension Expense = Service Cost - Expected return on plan assets + Prior service cost amortization + Interest cost
Interest Cost
= Interest rate * Projected benefit obligation
= 0.09 * 728,000
= $65,520
Pension Expense = 110,000 - 30,000 + 10,000 + 65,520
= $155,520
Answer:
40/54
Explanation:
Bob's GMI = $2,000
Rent = $800
Car lease = $199
Credit card payment = $80
First, we'd calculate the percentage of his income that is his rent.
We have,
(800 ÷ 1000) x 100%
=40%
then we can calculate what percentage of his GMI is his spending
we have,
(800 + 199 + 80) ÷ 2000
(1079 ÷ 2000) × 100%
= 0.54 × 100%
= 54%.
This means that Bob's qualifying ratio is 40/54 i.e his housing/debt ratio.
With a qualifying ratio of 40/54, it is very impossible for him to get the smallest of mortgage loan product, etc.
Bob will need to find a co-borrower or another person that can lend a higher amount.
Cheers.
Income $42,500
Less:
Deductions <u> 0</u>
Taxable Income $42,500
Tax rate <u> x 10%</u>
Tax payable $4,250
Bear in mind that since the problem is silent, I have assumed that deductions based on marital status, exemptions, PERS or TIAA/CREF retirement contributions are all equivalent to zero (0).
Genetech corp. has invested heavily to develop a patented new product. Genentech wants to achieve a rapid return on its investment. it probably should set a profit maximization.
Profit maximization in economics refers to the short- or long-term process through which a corporation chooses the price, input, and output levels that result in the largest profit. The firm is typically modelled as maximizing profit in neoclassical economics, which is currently the dominant approach to microeconomics.
Economic and social well-being are indirectly influenced by the profit maximization idea. A company uses and allocates resources effectively when it is profitable, and this results in payments for capital, fixed assets, labour, and organization. Economic and social welfare is achieved in this way.
Learn more about profit maximization here:
brainly.com/question/17233964
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes under the theory of conversion.
Explanation:
Conversion occurs when an individual takes possession of an item and excercises ownership of it in a way that is in conflict with the real owner's right of possession.
In this instance Eddy paid in a cheque that was not owned by him. The onus was on the bank to confirm from the account owner the real beneficiary of the check.
This would have prevented the conversion of the check through an illegal indorsement.
Conversion is a common type of fraud with regards to dividend warrants where dividend warrants edited to present a different person as the owner of the check.
