they claimed that without slaves the economy would collapse I think, I'm not quite sure if I'm remembering correctly though
The ruling is that he is still a slave to him master even tho he is in a
slave free state. And that he would still have to go back home with his
master.
Hope this helps
The answer is E. Upton Sinclair's The Jungle
The United States had 4,355,000 military personnel involved in World War I. ... The U.S. Navy played a major role in helping to blockade Germany, keeping out supplies and hurting Germany economically. The U.S. forces that were sent to Europe during World War I were called the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF).
Answer:
Chamberlain did what he could (should not have done it in any other way).
Explanation:
Chamberlain in his position as UK Prime Minister, going to such events as the Munich Conference, Germany was prepared for both options if Hitler refused or not. Hitler only agreed to stall time and his preparations for Czechoslovakia were already underway. If Chamberlain demanded better terms then Hitler would most likely refuse to sign it. It is possible if Britain and France had said something about the Remilitarization of the Rhineland then Hitler would have stopped these moves of aggression. Obviously, this move was a huge gamble for Hitler that paid off since France and Britain lacked the knowledge of a semi-weak Germany; instead, they saw legions of soldiers marching into the Rhineland fearing another war would come. If Chamberlain refused to negotiate, then that throws diplomacy right out the window and both Britain and France did not want to start another war so that is out of the question.
