Okay well Caesar and Brutus were friends of course. When Brutus decides to join the conspirators in their plot to kill Caesar. The second downfall is that he refused to listen to Cassius. Cassius told Brutus to kill Antony along with Caesar but he did not want the conspirators to appear as butchers so he allowed Antony to live And the last downfall is when he gave Antony permission to speak at Caesars funeral Again Cassius warned Brutus not to let Antony speak Cassius feared that Antony would turn the people against the conspirators and that exactly what happened Brutus had to flea for his life which ultimately lead to his dead.
Miss. Millie asked Sophia and to work for her and be her maid.
The text structure with the kind of information an author would present using that structure is differentiated down below:
Explanation:
Descriptive is the text structure an author uses which gives Information to help create a mind picture
Cause and effect
is the text structure an author uses which Makes the reader understand why something happened
.
Compare and contrast is the text structure an author uses which Shows what is the same and what is different between something
Argumentative is the text structure an author uses which gives Information that persuades the reader to the author's opinion
Answer:
1. Percent of school-age children in the U.S. who were homeschooled students in 2003 ⇒ 2.2%.
2. Percent of full time homeschooled students. ⇒ 82%.
3. Percent of homeschooled students also in school less than 9 hours ⇒ 12%.
4. Percent of homeschooled students were also in school 9-25 hours ⇒ 6%
.
5. Percent of homeschooled students from white families vs. other ethnicities ⇒ 77%.
6. Percent of homeschooled students from two-parent homes ⇒ 81%.
7. Percent of homeschooled students from two-parent homes with one parent working ⇒ 54%.
8. Percent of parents homeschooling because of school environment. ⇒ 85%
Relevance is ordinarily a necessary condition, but not a sufficient condition, for the admissibility of evidence. For example, relevant evidence may be excluded if its tendency to prove or disprove a fact is heavily outweighed by the possibility that the evidence will prejudice or confuse the jury.
