This question seems to be incomplete. However, there´s enough information to find the right answer.
I understand that this flag has serious important meanings . . . But that does not mean that . . . people may not under the First Amendment show their feelings by what Texas calls desecration of a venerated object. I think it's a most important case. I sense that it goes to the heart of the First Amendment, to hear things or to see things that we hate test the First Amendment more than seeing or hearing things that we like. It wasn't designed for things we like. They never needed a First Amendment.
—William M. Kunstler, Attorney for Gregory Lee Johnson, Texas v. Johnson
Use the drop-down menu to complete the sentence.
In this excerpt, attorney William Kunstler is arguing against his client's conviction.
The main idea of this excerpt is that the First Amendment is essential because it
Answer: allows for symbolic speech
Explanation:
After Gregory Lee Johnson, William Kunstler´s client, was tried and convicted for having burned an American flag to protest against Reagan´s government, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and the case was sent to the Supreme Court. The Texas v. Johnson court case brought up the question of whether or not the desecration of an American flag is a form of speech protected under the First Amendment. The court ruled that Johnson burning the flag was a form of expression with a distinctively political nature and was protected by the First Amendment.
Answer:
Competition between organizational forms manifests itself in political contention over the law. The authors analyze the political
strength and organization of the groups that supported and opposed
state anti-chain-store laws. The enactment of these laws depended
on intrastate political activity and the interstate diffusion of antichain-store legislation. The repeal process relied on supra state activity, as nationally organized pro-chain-store forces shifted the
arena of contention to the Supreme Court and forged national alliances with labor unions and agricultural cooperatives. In both
enactment and repeal, the political resources and strategies of organizational forms interacted with existing institutions to determine
the trajectory of institutional change.
Explanation:
Answer:
Weres the answers choice?
Explanation:
C woman never legally enlisted in army
Answer:
Because the government did not have enough resources to accomodate the influx of families from rural areas to the cities.
