1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adell [148]
3 years ago
5

Should Mel fisher have given his treasure to Spain explain your thinking

History
2 answers:
kotykmax [81]3 years ago
6 0
<span>No. The spanish ships stole the gold.</span>
liq [111]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

No, he shouldn't.

Since inside the ship Nuestra Señora de Atocha there were stolen goods as well as objects smuggled to avoid taxes.

Explanation:

It could be said that Mel Fisher could have delivered the treasure to the competent authorities in Spain, but when he saw that inside the ship Nuestra Señora de Atocha there were contraband objects, as well as stolen jewelry and personal property, he decided not to. He decided that the treasure would be included in the main part of the Mel Fisher collection. Museum of the Maritime Heritage Society.

You might be interested in
The Bretton Woods system a. ended in 1971 b. ended in 1939 when World War II began c. is currently the basis for the internation
kkurt [141]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. The Bretton Woods system ended in 1971.

Explanation:

The Bretton Woods system was a fixed exchange rate system in which the exchange rate for countries' currencies against the US dollar was fixed. From 1945 to 1971, it regulated exchange rates for member countries of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

In July 1944, an international conference was held in the small town of Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, with participants from 44 nations. It was decided to set up the International Monetary Fund and the Bretton Woods system, the latter being used until the early 1970s.

The agreement meant that the member countries joined a fixed exchange rate system, which set the exchange rate for the country's currency against the US dollar. Instead, the US guaranteed a fixed redemption price of the dollar in gold. Exchange rate changes were made only to adjust for "basic imbalances" in the balance of payments. In practice, the agreement meant an end to repeated and drastic devaluations of local currencies in search of competitiveness in the export market. Earlier currency restrictions could also be lifted, with the result that international trade could increase.  

The system was aborted in 1971, when the United States decided to no longer guarantee the dollar value with a fixed redemption price in gold, called the "Nixon shock". By then, the United States had already let the dollar exchange rate float in 1968. The reasons were, among other things, in the extremely costly Vietnam War for the United States. The result was that other currencies with previously fixed exchange rates also floated. The Bretton Woods system formally ceased in 1973, after vain attempts to stabilize key currencies.

4 0
3 years ago
In 1919, what was featured in newspapers that started in the Daily News? in photography
kupik [55]

Answer:

The New York Daily News was the first successful tabloid newspaper in the United States. It was founded in 1919 as the Illustrated Daily News by Joseph Medill Patterson and was a subsidiary of the Tribune Company of Chicago.

5 0
3 years ago
Which coat of arms does not belong?
Julli [10]

Answer:

I believe it is the 1st one

Explanation:

The first one is the Russian national football team logo

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Instead of proposing ratification by the state legislatures, the federalist proposal called for ratification of the constitution
Lady_Fox [76]
<span>Federalists proposed that popularly elected conventions should ratify the Constitution rather than the state legislatures themselves doing the ratifying.

</span><span>In this way, state legislators were not being asked to vote for a document that would have them give up some amount of their own state authority.  Also, by having those who attended the ratification conventions be elected by the people in their area to represent their interests, the Constitution would be seen as having the full consent of the people because they had directly elected the convention delegates who approved the Constitution.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How should freedom be protected or preserved
Arada [10]
Freedom should be protected because without freedom you cant do anything, hope this helps :)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1984, the United States Supreme Court, in ___________________, reversed a decision based on evidence obtained by investigator
    9·1 answer
  • The Norman Rockwell painting from 1943 was meant to remind people that "freedom of religion" was one of the reasons the United S
    14·2 answers
  • Why was the addition of France as an ally important in the revoloution
    9·1 answer
  • Which leader -calvin or luther- do you think had a greater impact?. please explain why.​
    12·1 answer
  • What makes a place a civilization?​
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Bangladesh separated from Pakistan
    14·1 answer
  • Who runs House of Representatives
    14·1 answer
  • Assume that you are a member of a special interest group that wants to raise taxes on certain items. Who would you present your
    15·2 answers
  • Franklin Roosevelt was a Democrat, but most of his family were Republicans. (Page
    7·1 answer
  • What guiding principle of the Constitution is most clearly demonstrated in the first amendment to the Constitution?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!