The primary assumptions were that the Executive Branch, in the "prosecution of war", has the right to take every precaution and every action in order to prevent espionage and other domestic threats.
This was tied to the assumption that Japanese Americans presented a danger to the United States, and that their ultimate loyalty was to the Japanese Empire.
The author's purpose in both Patrick Henry’s speech and Thomas Paine's common sense is discussed below.
<h3>What distinguishes Patrick Henry from Thomas Paine?</h3>
Thomas Paine employed a sardonic, formal tone, whereas Patrick Henry used a furious, yet emotional tone. But in the end, Patrick Henry's delivery worked better at persuading American colonists to support independence.
The best course of action is to PERSUADE THE COLONISTS TO RESIST the BRITISH RULE.
When the British were in charge of the colonies, these two authors published their writings. The main goal of the writings of these two authors is to persuade the colonists that refusing to rebel against the oppressive British authority serves no useful purpose and that doing so is the only option for them to achieve independence.
Learn more about Patrick Henry from Thomas Paine here:
brainly.com/question/16576227
#SPJ1
Answer:
unable or not
Explanation:
disable means that you are not able to do something and impossible means it is not possible. Think of other words like dissimilar which means apart from similar.
Answer: Bring people together almost as MLK did
Explanation: I would make the world a better place by bringing everyone together no matter race, creed, or religion because there seems to be a huge divide between different types of race. Everyone needs to be there for each other in order for the world to become a better place. I would do this to see the oncoming generations thrive peacefully without the thought of having to be better than another country or have more of a certain thing for social status.
