The correct answer is A. It is difficult to understand the part of "seven years' transportation to America". It seems to me that you should use a passive structure so as to place the kind of sentences that English courts were allowed to give first, and after mention that the first Penal Transportation Act was the one which introduced this change. The other answers do not apply to this sentence, there are no puntuation and spelling mistakes, and there are no unnecessary words.
This question is about the speech "Gorbachev, Tear Down This Wall"
Answer:
Reagan had an appealing tone, but with authority. His purpose was to win the public's attention and show that he was committed to destroying the limitation that the Germans were going through because of the Berlin wall.
Explanation:
Reagan's speech, despite showing authority, was appealing, as he asked for the Berlin wall to be broken down, but showed that he would fight for it.
Reagan used this type of positioning because he wanted to reach the empathy of the audience that was listening to him, showing that he respected them and understood the situation in which they lived, but also showed that he was willing to fight and take the people out of what oppressed them.
Answer:
I think one thing Steinbeck is trying to get his readers to understand is that people need each other, even if the relationships may not fit the conventional paradigm that society might expect.
Explanation:
George and Lennie are the obvious example here. One man is short and "street-wise", while the other man is huge and simple-minded. All the same, the two men need each other, compliment one another (one provides "the brains", the other provides "the brawn"), and share a common dream.
Okay so what's the question?
Answer:
B. consider whether he ought to go back to find more evidence
C. think about whether he needs to change his perspective
Explanation:
When making research and the researcher discovers that his initial ideas support a different perspective, he should consider whether he needs to go back and get more evidence and whether he needs to change his perspective, so that the ideas would match the perspective.
