1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
2 years ago
11

WHAT IS A MODERN DAY EXAMPLE OF BLACKLISTING? WHAT KINDS OF THINGS CAN GET YOU BLACKUSTED??

History
2 answers:
mixer [17]2 years ago
6 0
Recording artist that don’t follow their labels rules
777dan777 [17]2 years ago
6 0
A blacklist might consist, for example, of a list of names developed by a company that refuses to hire individuals who have been indent as union organizers
You might be interested in
Here is a question that very few people should get
labwork [276]

Answer:

A hallucination involves seeing, hearing, smelling or tasting something that doesn't actually exist. Hallucinations can be the result of mental health problems like Alzheimer's disease, dementia or schizophrenia, but also be caused by other things including alcohol or drugs.Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the reasons listed in the preview do you think best apply to the spanish-american war why?
jarptica [38.1K]
I can help you but you need to show the preview or explain the preview.
5 0
3 years ago
Should presidents be allowed to use executive orders to change policy, such as the minimum wage for federal contractors, or shou
raketka [301]

Answer:

It is your decision on if it is right, but I will give insight on the very basics of how our government deals with power distribution and why. And a touch of opinion. Happy New Year!

Explanation:

Giving the president the power of executive authority would make our government the same as a dictatorial one. That is one of the main reasons our government has 3 branches, it’s a checks and balances system that keeps those in power relying on each other to make decisions. The question of if it is right that a president should or shouldn’t have executive authority has raged on every since America first considered becoming independent from Britain, but based on the numerous times a British monarch given executive authority abused it, we can guess the same thing could easily happen with our president. At the very least a president should not have full freedom in passing policies, but the real difficult question is “To what extent should a president be able to pass policies, and congress oversee the affairs of the president?” This question applies to not just the president and Congress, but also the judicial branch and state governments. It’s a tough question.

8 0
3 years ago
Mark three ways the attitudes of the United States changed after World War I. It lost interest in progressive causes. It had mor
Liono4ka [1.6K]

<u>Options A, C, E.</u>

<u>Here is why:</u>

It lost interest in progressive causes.

Before and during World War I, many people who were progressive supported the war. Woodrow Wilson, who was the president of the United States at the time, made it seem like World War I was the "war of all wars" and it would end violence around the world. This seems very contradicting, but progressives believed in what he was saying along with other citizens. All of this caused progressivism to fall after World War I, as people started to realize the cruelty and death that happened during the war and associated being progressive with wanting war.

~

It wanted to return to a normal lifestyle.

After World War I was over, many American citizens just wanted to return to a normal lifestyle. World War I came with many casualties, hardships, and cost the United States a lot of money. Many people were tired and wanted to return back to normal and wanted to avoid another huge conflict. This caused the debate if whether or not the United States should back away from foreign affairs and even try to ignore them.

~

It was very concerned with the question of isolationism or internationalism.

Although some people in the United States wanted to back away from foreign affairs, isolationism and internationalism was always a question. Isolationism is the act of ignoring and not getting involved in foreign affairs and wars, even if a friendly foreign country needed help. Some people wanted this, as they didn't want anymore American casualties and debt and wanted to always remain in a normal and comfortable lifestyle. Internationalism is the exact opposite and is the act of getting involved in everything important in outside affairs and occurrences. Many people argued that this was correct, as it was important that America evolved with the country to exert and bring peace and prevent wrong doings, harmful ideologies and some countries from becoming too powerful.

5 0
2 years ago
Can i plz plz plz get some help quickly
Kazeer [188]
What the passage supposed to be, we can’t see it
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mark the true statements. Select all that apply. Nazism and fascism have some similarities. Political and economic, but not soci
    9·1 answer
  • 10 points I NEED HELP https://brainly.com/question/10133959
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of the expansion of Islam into India?
    11·2 answers
  • Did jacksons response to the nullification crisis promote democracy
    9·1 answer
  • Why were military leaders able to institute the Roman empire
    7·2 answers
  • What country came into conflict with the zulu over territory?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the palmer raids meant to uncover ?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Black Panther Party considered "radical" in the Civil Rights era? A) They were endorsed by a wide range of African A
    8·2 answers
  • Due to the printing press and with more
    14·1 answer
  • Which answer best shows all of the elements you need to consider when choosing an investment?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!