1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firdavs [7]
3 years ago
7

What does a strict constructionist believe

History
2 answers:
leonid [27]3 years ago
7 0
They believe that a government should exercise only the powers specifically listed in the constitution. 
satela [25.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The government should exercise only the powers specifically listed in the Constitution.

Explanation:

In the United States, strict constructionism refers to a distinct legal philosophy that restricts interpretation, as it only welcomes a narrow reading of constitutional texts.

Since the United States Constitution was composed in rather general terms, there have been many debates about how to interpret it.

Strict constructionism applies a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, denying ratifications and insisting that Congress should only exercise expressed powers.

You might be interested in
Did Simon bolivar's plan to use "nativism" fail
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

There were a number of reasons for Bolivar's failure to unite the states; however, one of the more prominent reasons was his refusal to realize that the people did not necessarily share his goal.  In 1826 civil war erupted in Colombia, and Bolívar returned in haste to prevent a clash between the conflicting factions.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which sequence correctly depicts the order of Russia’s political structure during the 20th century?
Nat2105 [25]
For the most of the 20th century Russia was a Communist country with Socilaistic central planned economy and ruled by one party.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does anyone have the answers to the semester A exam in U.S History
zhuklara [117]
Nope sorry maybe if you put the questions :(
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The difference between gentleman’s warfare and militia warfare in the revolutionary war
jekas [21]

Answer:

There's a popular belief that Americans fought and won the entire revolution with nothing but guerrilla warfare. That's not true, and the myth largely stems from how the war began. The very first military engagement between British and American forces occurred on April 19 of 1775. American militia men had been covertly transporting weapons and colonial government leaders from town to town, hiding them from the British army. The British heard about these stockpiles in the Massachusetts towns of Lexington and Concord and went to seize them. The American volunteers of these town gathered together to oppose the British, resulting in a brief skirmish. As the British beat a hasty retreat back towards Boston, American militia units basically popped out of the bushes along the entire road, shot a few volleys, and disappeared. It wasn't enough to decimate the British, but the British weren't prepared for it, and it drove them back.

Explanation:

Imagine that you are in charge of leading a small army of volunteer soldiers against the largest and most powerful professional army in the world. Are you going to march straight into battle? Not if you expect it to be a very long one!

For centuries, small armies have relied on guerrilla warfare to help even the odds. This includes non-traditional wartime tactics like ambushing, sabotage, and raids rather than direct engagements. Guerrilla warfare is not meant to really defeat an opponent; instead, the idea is to make the war drag on and become so expensive that your adversary gives up. It's the different between fighting a professional boxer versus a swarm of mosquitoes - the mosquitoes won't kill you, but they just may drive you away.

Amongst the many armies to try out these tactics were the American colonists fighting for their independence. The American Revolution was a conflict between a group of volunteers and a massive professional army. Did they think they could defeat Britain, the heavyweight champion of European colonialism? Maybe not, but while Britain prepared to defend its title, it was the colonists who learned how to 'float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.'

8 0
3 years ago
why did the americans want the articles of confederation changed? pls i suck at history. will give brainliest to any decent answ
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

The Articles of Confedaration failed because they were set up to make the Federal Govdernment as weak as possible. The Articles of Confederation also lacked a bill of rights.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a word for open attack, usually armed?
    9·2 answers
  • Elected officials are interested in the results of public opinion polls because they want to focus on issues that are important
    8·2 answers
  • The Nullification Crisis of the 1830s was
    7·2 answers
  • The diagram is an example of
    12·2 answers
  • During the American Revolution, who were freed slaves most likely to fight for?
    14·1 answer
  • Under the leadership of Charles de Gaulle, what government was formed? a. Maquis c. Vichy b. Free French d. Nazi
    7·1 answer
  • What result did the vast network of trade routes have on the muslim empire
    14·1 answer
  • The War of 1812 changed the attitudes of the people toward the national government because they were determined not to be unifie
    6·1 answer
  • Which dispute occurred during the Constitutional Convention?
    14·1 answer
  • Slavery as it was practiced in the American South is complicated to explain, at best.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!