1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANTONII [103]
3 years ago
11

Which event signaled the beginning of WWII for the United States?

History
2 answers:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A  :)

Explanation:

Elenna [48]3 years ago
4 0
The attack on Pearl Harbor I believe
You might be interested in
Which colonial region was most known for plantations, large numbers of slaves, and the production of rice and tobacco
Kaylis [27]
It was the southern colonies,
4 0
3 years ago
While soviets rejoiced in the success of the sputnik program, americans
Kaylis [27]

While soviets rejoiced in the attainment of the sputnik system, Americans  feared soviet advancements in science.

<h3>What advancements made Sputnik possible?</h3>

Sputnik made the possible to study the radio wave transmission and density of the atmosphere easy. He also supported the scientist to learn to track objects in orbit. He encourages testing satellite pressurization. This made pressure to America for advance of technology.

Thus, option A is correct.

For more details about advancements made Sputnik possible,  click here:

brainly.com/question/13588207

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
HELP FAST WILL MARK BRAINLY IF ITS A GOOD AWNSER
alexandr1967 [171]

The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire existing from the mid-to-late 3rd century CE to 543 CE. At its zenith, from approximately 319 to 467 CE, it covered much of the Indian subcontinent.

6 0
3 years ago
Helpp
shtirl [24]

Answer: the three on the bottom to the right

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
    15·2 answers
  • How does Earl Thorpe account for the popularity of Booker T. Washington among blacks in his day?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the "Four Noble Truths"?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the social contract differ from the divine right of kings
    9·1 answer
  • What social classes existed in ur
    6·1 answer
  • How did the religious identity developing around Muhammad's prophecy propel the growth of an Arabic Islamic empire
    5·1 answer
  • Which beliefs did Franco promote in an effort to create one culture in Spain?
    13·2 answers
  • This group settled closest to the Bering Straight, where a land bridge formed 15-20 thousand
    10·1 answer
  • A region’s main roads are related to its physical features.
    5·1 answer
  • The direction of Kings Mountain from Camden ?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!