Congress attempted to grant this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
The congress of the United States of America has granted certain powers to the president to nullify the part of the bill and that is called line item veto. This can also be termed as partial veto.
The line item veto will give powers to the president to cancel certain provision in the bill and namely budget appropriation bill without vetoing the entire legislative bill.
Supreme Court of America as ruled that it is unconstitutional and it stated that Line Item Veto Act of 1996 has violated the fundamental principle of the presidential clause of the constitution.
Answer:
1. It helps to paint a picture in reader's mind.
2. Connotative meaning
3. Denotative and Literal
4. They involve representations and They work with connotative meaning.
Explanation: The website i used for this information is https://www.jiskha.com/questions/1870419/which-statement-explain-how-the-figurative-meaning-of-a-word-or-phrase-helps-a-reader-it
Answer:
Comparative negligence is a principle of tort law that applies to casualty insurance in certain states. Comparative negligence states that when an accident occurs, the fault and/or negligence of each party involved is based upon their respective contributions to the accident.
Primary obligations are not within the statute of frauds and therefore need not be in writing to be enforceable.
Answer:
I would think that only if they are pointing the guns at the officers or other individuals.
Explanation:
I found this on the internet though. Hope it helps some.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/can-police-use-lethal-force-fleeing-suspect
Can police officers shoot at fleeing individuals?
Only in very narrow circumstances. A seminal 1985 Supreme Court case, Tennessee vs. Garner, held that the police may not shoot at a fleeing person unless the officer reasonably believes that the individual poses a significant physical danger to the officer or others in the community. That means officers are expected to take other, less-deadly action during a foot or car pursuit unless the person being chased is seen as an immediate safety risk.
In other words, a police officer who fires at a fleeing man who a moment earlier murdered a convenience store clerk may have reasonable grounds to argue that the shooting was justified. But if that same robber never fired his own weapon, the officer would likely have a much harder argument.
“You don’t shoot fleeing felons. You apprehend them unless there are exigent circumstances — emergencies — that require urgent police action to safeguard the community as a whole,” said Greg Gilbertson, a police practices expert and criminal justice professor at Centralia College in Washington state.
