Answer:
Those who defend the use of animals in research contend that nonhuman animals are enough like humans to make them scientifically adequate models of humans, but different enough to make it morally acceptable to experiment on them. In addition to the ethical objections to causing suffering to other sentient species, inherent issues with animal models including differences from humans in both size and physiology, genetic differences, and variations in biological targets limit the ability of data collected from an animal model to be translated to people.
<h2>
HOPE I HELP U</h2>
Answer:
This is a difficult situation. If a juror would see the defendant crying it could impose that they are sorry for what they did if they were guilty. Dressing appropriately can show you're not a bum and do have dignity. Acting appropriately can impose you are mature.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Explanation:
As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.
<em>Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.</em>
Answer:
True/cooperative drivers would likely be the most correct one, if that's what you're asking.
Explanation:
