1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anika [276]
3 years ago
11

Last time. FREEEEE POINTSSSSS LETS GOOO 100 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Law
2 answers:
neonofarm [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Thanks u so much

joja [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

AHH THANK YOU SO SO MUCHHH

Explanation:

HAVE A GREAT DAY!!! :)

You might be interested in
In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer: The answer is explained below

Explanation:

A layoff is a termination of an employment at the employer's will. A layoff may be either temporary or permanent and can occur for reasons such as new technology, downsizing, or changes in market conditions. In this case with regards to the question, Amina told Bryan that his service is no longer needed due to an economic circumstances. While accepting and signing a job offer, there are legal agreement which has to be made.

Here,an anticipatory breach occurs when Amina states, in advance of the due date that Bryan was meant to start the job that she intends not fulfilling the agreement of having him as a delivery man.

In this situation, Bryan can't sue Amina because it wasn't her fault that an economic situation arises. If he had left a previous job to take Amina's offer, that could have been a different case.

According to the labour welfare law, in case any employer rejects the job offer the individual can raise a concern against him. An economic conditions can come up anytime so Bryan shouldn't sue Amina.

5 0
3 years ago
The method of delivering a chemical or any other agent is called
timama [110]
The method of delivering a chemical is called Dispersion
5 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

The difference is that the original jurisdiction is where the case begins and the appellate jurisdiction is when the court reviews another court's decision.

Explanation:

Original jurisdiction refers to the right of the court to hear the case first and appellate jurisdiction refers to the right of a higher court to review a court's decision.

7 0
3 years ago
Do you think that it’s legal to recreat the cards of a game, and play it with other people?
SashulF [63]
No I don’t think it is
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and killed her husband and his lover after discovering them having $exxxx in his car. When
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

The judgement will base on the crime committed

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does a traffic control officer do
    10·2 answers
  • What does "200 ft." mean to a driver when we are talking about: A horn? A rear-view mirror?
    6·1 answer
  • Should there be limits on campaign contributions people and businesses can make to political campaigns. Why or Why not?
    15·1 answer
  • Researchers who ascribe to the belief that there are multiple realities to be discovered are known as
    9·1 answer
  • help, please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please ple
    13·1 answer
  • How can you institute a criminal action
    11·1 answer
  • Where can you go to have your will notarized and made legal?
    11·1 answer
  • E. Write the difference between input device and output device​
    13·1 answer
  • Người vi phạm hành chính thì bị xử lý hành chính đúng hay sai tại sao
    6·1 answer
  • Ase Study
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!