Answer:
They are written in this manner in order to to reduce the influence of acquiescent bias (responding).
Explanation:
Acquiescence bias (responding) is a category of response bias in which respondents to a survey have a tendency to agree with all the questions or to indicate a positive connotation. Acquiescence is sometimes referred to as "yea-saying" and is the tendency of a respondent to agree with a statement when in doubt.
By formating the Likert scale so that in one half agreeing with means that the person has the variables measured and the other half means that the variable is not measured avoides acquiescent bias (responding).
Answer:
reasonable
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that from a purely economic perspective, the death penalty for computer hackers is reasonable. This is because if all the information provided is true, that means that computer hackers are causing millions of dollars in damage from their hacks, and if a murder execution benefits society with approximately $56 million then we can assume that, an execution for a computer hacker will also deter other hackers and save a significantly higher amount of money for society. This is all based on a purely economic stand point but the death penalty should not be decided on economics alone but also take into consideration social, political, and religious factors.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a mix of the patronage and merit systems, with the vast majority of positions being filled by merit.
Explanation:
The Federal bureaucracy system is involved with working on some aspects of bills passed by the Congress. It comprises of a mix of the patronage and merit systems. The patronage system involves appointment of close allies, supporters or friends into political positions while the merit system involves election on merit, expertise and abilities.
In today’s world the federal bureaucracy system is a mix of the patronage and merit systems with the vast majority of positions being filled by merit.
Perhaps show us the 4 possible choices, so we can tell you which is the conflict/struggle? This is a bit of an issue, not a great proof-read question...
