Answer:
The "policy approach" Obama seems to be embracing was best articulated by ... believed the most common source of different opinions to be property, he also ... of his presidential campaign:
Explanation:
i read it in my favorite obama book
Answer:
An apple, potato, and onion all taste the same if you eat them with your nose plugged
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?
As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.
It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,
Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.
Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.
So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.
According to the passage, the possible trade-offs for consumers in return for reduced pollution, are that sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks will be forced to meet stricter standards as passenger cars for the first time meaning that the purchase cost of those vehicles would increase, as well as the fact that all gasoline prices will be increased. This means that for the consumers, the price point to run a car or purchase a sports vehicle or pickup truck will be increased.
