Answer:
Soft money
Explanation:
Soft money can be understood from the sobriquet, 'soft'. It is more or less a paper money. This is a well used fund in varying political circles. Thus, political parties can receive these funds and/or contributions from businesses and/or organization that are not regulated by the Federal Election Commission.
The implication of the non regulation by the Federal Election Commission is that there will be no limits as to the levels and degree of contributions that could be made.
The idea of soft money hinges on a fundamental human rights of free speech. As such, unnecessary influence is often eliminated in a bid to fulfil the rules that apply to such donations. The money are often made to political parties or individuals via direct or proxy routes.
Answer:
1. what you think about the environmental legislation.
2. is this environmental legislation helpful to gain the require results
Explanation:
1. what you think about the environmental legislation.
2. is this environmental legislation helpful to gain the require results
These two questions would best elicit accurate polling data because the answers of these questions explains us the public opinion about the environmental legislation implemented by the government so we can conclude that these two questions are enough to know the public opinion.
Newton Knight, a white Mississippi farmer, led armed opposition to the Confederacy during the U.S. Civil War, creating “The Free State of Jones,” a county that supported the Union in the war.
Website -https://www.biography.com/historical-figure/newton-knight
There’s a lot more on him on that website
Hey there! This ability that the Supreme Court has which interprets the Constitution <u>is called judicial review (A).</u> <u />This ability is determines whether a law or action is constitutional or unconstitutional. The law, action, or decision is looked over by the Supreme Court before it is deemed constitutional or unconstitutional.
I hope this helps! ^__^
During the War of 1812, Madison discovered that the federal system limited the ability of Congress and the president to wage war.