Question:
a. diabetes
b. osteoporosis
c. kidney disease
d. stroke
e. heart disease
Kidney disease condition would require an adjustment in the recommended intake of protein that differs from the RDA.
<h3>
What does "recommended dietary allowance" refer to?</h3>
The Food and Nutrition Board has determined the levels of essential nutrient intake known as Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) to be sufficient to meet the known nutrient needs of nearly all healthy individuals.
For those unable to excrete nitrogenous wastes, such as those with severe liver disease or renal failure, protein restriction is employed.
The recommended dietary allowance is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight for an average inactive adult.
For more information regarding recommended dietary allowance, visit:
brainly.com/question/14484523
#SPJ1
Answer:
HIPAA - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Explanation:
Based on the information we have, we can confirm that when Simon is looking for the bottle containing pleural fluid, he should gravitate towards the bottle with a clear or slightly yellow liquid.
<h3>Why should he choose this bottle?</h3>
Simon is looking for pleural fluid. This means that he is looking to find a bottle with a sample of the fluid used by the lungs to allow breathing to take place. This liquid is described as a clear or slightly yellow-colored liquid.
Therefore, we can confirm that when Simon is looking for the bottle containing pleural fluid, he should choose the bottle with a clear or slightly yellow liquid.
To learn more about the lungs visit:
brainly.com/question/271268?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
