I think one about the significant issues that Japan confronts these days is not overpopulation. The Japanese populace has been declining over the previous decade or somewhere in the vicinity. The issue is not the quantity of individuals but rather the make-up of that populace.
The rate of Japanese individuals resigning or drawing near to retirement age has been expanding for quite a long time. Nowadays, there are more "old" individuals in Japan than there are "youthful" individuals. Japanese ladies are holding up longer to get hitched and couples simply are having the same number of youngsters as they did decades before.
This has put a tremendous strain on the Social Welfare framework on the grounds that there are essentially insufficient Japanese youngsters paying annuity premiums, charges or whatever to take care of the wellbeing expense and benefits advantages of every one of the individuals who either as of now have or will in the blink of an eye be resigning.
In many ways, Pyrrhus is a foil to Hamlet. For example, Pyrrhus is impulsive and rash, while Hamlet is contemplative and indecisive.
What is Pyrrhus?
Pyrrhus was a Hellenistic-era Greek king and statesman. He was the Aeacid royal house's king of the Greek Molossians tribe before succeeding to the throne of Epirus. He was regarded as being one of the greatest generals in ancient times and was one of early Rome's strongest adversaries. He suffered intolerably high losses in a number of his victories, giving rise to the phrase "Pyrrhic victory." 13-year-old Pyrrhus had become king of Epirus in 306 BC, but Cassander overthrew him four years later. He participated in the Diadochi Wars before being helped by Ptolemy I Soter to retake his throne in 297 BC. In the course of what became known as the Pyrrhic War,
Additionally, Pyrrhus is vengeful and driven by a desire for revenge, while Hamlet is more concerned with justice. Finally, Pyrrhus is single-minded in his pursuit of his goals, while Hamlet is easily distracted.
To learn more about Pyrrhus
brainly.com/question/5617546
#SPJ4
Answer:
Bad attitude.
Explanation:
The attitudes and politics of Americans toward immigration in the 1920s was not good because Americans thought that these immigrants increase unemployment as well decreases the wages. Many Americans feared that there was high unemployment rate in America after World War I. New immigrants were used to break strikes and were blamed for the deterioration in wages so we can say that Americans attitudes turns bad due to the above factors,
Answer:
Explanation:
In September 1692 The Salem witch trials began after some girls in Salem Village, Massachusetts, said that they were possessed by the devil and blamed three women for having afflicted them a slave a beggar and an old impoverished woman. The first woman was hanged and eighteen others followed. The hysteria had extended and the public turned against the trials.
