Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
Answer:
Although a single plane crash always rekindles in us a fear of flying because fatalities seem high in terms of how many die in one crash, the truth is, according to statistics, flying on a plane on average is overwhelmingly safer than riding in a car or other road vehicle. But some of the advances of road transport is
Explanation:
Less Capital Outlay. ...
Door to Door Service. ...
Service in Rural Areas. ...
Flexible Service. ...
Suitable for Short Distance. ...
Lesser Risk of Damage in Transit. ...
Saving in Packing Cost. ...
Hello. You didn't show which words are underlined, so I'll give you the grammatical name and function of all of them.
What: Pronoun. It has the function of referring to or replacing a noun, representing something, which does not have a specific name, but which needs to be represented in the sentence. The pronoun is a variable word.
To do: Verb. It has the function of representing an action, an activity that will be performed by something or someone.
Is: Verb. It has the ability to represent a state or occurrence.
Problem: Noun. It has the function of naming something or someone.
Complete Question: Which event in the play best reflects johnson's words?
A). Travis and his friends playing with a rat in the alley.
B). Beneatha considering going to Africa with Asagai.
C). The Youngers deciding to move to Clybourne Park.
D). Beneatha wearing her hair naturally and dancing to African music.
Answer: is Option: B). Beneatha considering going to Africa with Asagai.
In the given passage all other options are not correct rather than option B. Because by reading the one passage one can easily come to know that Beneatha is considering going to Africa with Asagai, this is the event in the play which best reflects the Johnson's words. So, the only right option for the given passage is option:B.
