The poet described about the kill of the Element is given below.
Explanation:
In the 1920s a young would-be poet, an ex-Etonian named Eric Blair, arrived as a Burma Police recruit and was posted to several places, culminating in Moulmein. Here he was accused of killing a timber company elephant, the chief of police saying he was a disgrace to Eton. Blair resigned while back in England on leave, and published several books under his assumed name, George Orwell.
In 1936 these were followed by what he called a “sketch” describing how, and more importantly why, he had killed a runaway elephant during his time in Moulmein, today known as Mawlamyine. By this time Orwell was highly regarded, and many were reluctant to accept that he had indeed killed an elephant. Six years later, however, a cashiered Burma Police captain named Herbert Robinson published a memoir in which he reported young Eric Blair (whom he called “the poet”) as saying back in the 1920s that he wanted to kill an elephant.
All the same, doubt has persisted among Orwell’s biographers. Neither Bernard Crick nor DJ Taylor believe he killed an elephant, Crick suggesting that he was merely influenced by a fashionable genre that blurred the line between fiction and autobiography.
To me, Orwell’s description of the great creature’s heartbreakingly slow death suggests an acute awareness of wrongdoing, as do his repeated protests: “I had no intention of shooting the elephant… I did not in the least want to shoot him … I did not want to shoot the elephant.” Though Orwell shifts the blame on to the imperialist system, I think the poet did shoot the elephant. But read the sketch and decide for yourself.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The diction of <span>"What the Black Man Wants" would be best described as formal and scholarly. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
Answer:
Two against arguments about the claim that Americans do not need to learn a second language is that the world will not be limited to publishing information only in English, and that American professionals who speak more than one language have better opportunities.
Explanation:
The article "Why Learn Another Language?" shows how the United States should encourage its citizens to learn another language, even if the whole world is learning English. The text shows that by learning a second language, Americans will have more opportunities, both in the professional area and in capturing new information that can be transmitted in several languages. In a nutshell, the text shows that learning another language only brings benefits to people's lives.
Tyson shows that humans are powerless against the force of nature, while Collins presents an individual creating his own destiny.
<h3>What do these opinions represent?</h3>
- The diversity of thought.
- The complexity of the subject.
- The possibility of divergent opinions.
By observing two different opinions, the reader can see how human existence and its positioning to the elements around it is something complex, deep, and full of nuances that can create a diversity of arguments.
Learn more about arguments at the link:
brainly.com/question/1485606
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The answer could either be B or D, mostly B, because they can happen any time, any age, towards anyone.
D, also true because after an identity crisis, things, mostly the way one thinks, changes.
