All categories

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Brums [2.3K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

2.21 gallons

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of sides:

2(10*3 + 1/2(14 + 10)*6) = 204 square feet

Area of the bottom:

20(3 + 10 + 5 + 10 + 6) = 680 square feet

Total area:

204 + 680 = 884 square feet

Paint needed:

884 / 400 = 2.21 gallons

You might be interested in

What is the value of x in the equation 0.7 x - 1.4 = -3.5

Daniel [21]

Answer:

x=12.5

Step-by-step explanation:

0.7x times (-1.4)=-3.5

-0.28x=-3.5 (divide both sides)

Ans:12.5

4 0

3 years ago

Kate Kevin and Levi are comparing how fast they can run. Kate was able to run 5 miles in 47.5 minutes. Kevin was able to run 8 m

mr Goodwill [35]

I think it would be Kate,Kevin and then Levi
I think

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consider the following set of vectors. v1 = 0 0 0 1 , v2 = 0 0 3 1 , v3 = 0 4 3 1 , v4 = 8 4 3 1 Let v1, v2, v3, and v4 be (colu

Alona [7]

Answer:

We have the equation

$c_1\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\0\\1\end{array}\right] +c_2\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\3\\1\end{array}\right] +c_3\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\4\\3\\1\end{array}\right] +c_4\left[\begin{array}{c}8\\4\\3\\1\end{array}\right] =\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\0\\0\end{array}\right]$

Then, the augmented matrix of the system is

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0&0&0&8\\0&0&4&4\\0&3&3&3\\1&1&1&1\end{array}\right]$

We exchange rows 1 and 4 and rows 2 and 3 and obtain the matrix:

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&1&1&1\\0&3&3&3\\0&0&4&4\\0&0&0&8\end{array}\right]$

This matrix is in echelon form. Then, now we apply backward substitution:

$8c_4=0\\c_4=0$

$4c_3+4c_4=0\\4c_3+4*0=0\\c_3=0$

$3c_2+3c_3+3c_4=0\\3c_2+3*0+3*0=0\\c_2=0$

$c_1+c_2+c_3+c_4=0\\c_1+0+0+0=0\\c_1=0$

Then the system has unique solution that is $(c_1,c_2c_3,c_4)=(0,0,0,0)$ and this imply that the vectors $v_1,v_2,v_3,v_4$ are linear independent.

4 0

3 years ago

The difference of 2 and the product of 3and k

allsm [11]

2-3k because the difference between something means it is subtraction and the product of 3 and k would just be 3k since you don't know what k is.

7 0

3 years ago

The variance can never bea.zerob.larger than the standard deviationc.negatived.smaller than the standard deviation

MrRa [10]

Answer:

c.negative

True, by definition since the variance take in count the differences around the mean squared, then we can't have a negative value for a sum of square values.

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to remember that the variance is a measure of dispersion for a dataset respect to a measure of central tendency called the mean. The mean is defined as:

$\bar x = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}$

And the population mean is given by:

$\mu= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{N}$

The population variance is defined by:

$\sigma^2 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\mu)^2}{N}$

And the sample variance is defined as:

$s^2= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\bar x)}{n-1}$

Now if we analyze the options we have this:

a.zero

False, if all the values are the same then the mean would be the same to the values and the difference between each value and the mean would 0 and indeed the variance would be 0.

b.larger than the standard deviation

False, if the population standard deviation is $\sigma=2$ then the variance would be $\sigma^2 = 4$ and as we can see is higher than the standard deviation

c.negative

True, by definition since the variance take in count the differences around the mean squared, then we can't have a negative value for a sum of square values.

d.smaller than the standard deviation

False, if the population standard deviation is $\sigma=0.1$ then the variance would be $\sigma^2 = 0.01$ and as we can see is lower than the standard deviation

7 0

3 years ago