The assignment wants to know your interpretation of themes in these two works. As acting is a very personal thing, I can't show you how you interpreted the stories, but I can show you how to write this essay.
<h3>Test structure</h3>
- Introduction: Introduce the two works, their authors, and their impact on literature and society. The introduction must be a short paragraph.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. In the first paragraph, you will show how the themes in the two stories are similar and manage to show similar messages to the reader. In the second paragraph, you will show how these themes are different and address different messages. These paragraphs must be long.
- Conclusion: You will summarize the most important points of the essay and emphasize the efficiency of each work in forming relevant and very significant themes for current and ancient society. This paragraph should also be short.
The theme of a story is the message that the author conveys to the reader through the text.
Among the themes of Picasso's The Tragedy we can see:
- Human suffering as punishment.
- The human loss.
- Emotional weakness.
- Disillusionment amid failures.
- Corrupted morals.
Among the themes of Sophocles' Oedipus the King, we can see:
- The consequences of punishment.
- The suffering is caused by punishment.
- Fate versus free will.
Below you can see an example of how your introduction might be written.
<em> Sophocles' Oedipus the King and Picasso's The Tragedy are two very important works for literature and art in general because of their themes, expressions, and meanings. These themes speak directly to the reader's emotions and manage to trigger emotions, reflections, and self-knowledge in a very imposing way.</em>
Learn more about writing essays at the link:
brainly.com/question/683722
#SPJ1
Need more information to complete the question. Which book is this?
Answer:
B). Definition
Explanation:
Organizational strategy is defined as the order or sequence in which the author explains a particular process or presents a series of episodes/occurrences. It primarily functions to comprehend readers' understanding of the concept.
As per the question, the author must employ 'definition' as the organizational strategy if the concepts are new to the reader as it will help in introducing the meaning of the word to them and then moving on to the terms or details associated with it as it will allow them to understand it effectively and efficiently. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
Answer:
The second one "issues happening in society"
Explanation:
