Answer: The research team can conclude right away that the cell line is a "cancer cell or a cell that emanates from a tumor cell".
Explanation: 'Density-dependent inhibition is when cell growth has a reached a limited density which in turn will slow down the rate of cell growth because of lack of new 'anchorage' point (new cells to adhere and be in contact with).
'Anchorage Dependence' is the need for cells to be in contact (adherence) with another layer of cells. Cells require anchorage in order to survive.
The reason why the researchers will conclude right away that the cell line is a "cancer/tumour cell" is because normal cells display density dependence inhibition while cancer cells 'proliferate' (increase in number) regardless/independent of cell density.
Normal cells adhere to each other (need to be in contact with each other) and form orderly array of cells while cancer cells do not adhere to cells and can migrate over adjacent cells thereby growing in a disorderly manner.
A boat's capacity plate gives the maximum weight and/or number of people the boat can carry safely in certain weather conditions.
This plate indicates the most weight potential and/or the maximum number of humans that the boat can deliver properly in excellent weather. You ought to now not exceed both the said maximum weight capacity or the maximum number of humans. maximum weight is the mixed weight of passengers, gear, and cars.
Many boat captains will tell you that, as a popular rule-of-thumb, multiplying your vessel's period by its most width and dividing that variety by way of 15 (or on occasion 18) will give you the total wide variety of passengers that your boat can adequately deliver.
The potential plate in your trailer ought to look just like this situation. Multiply the GAWR by using the number of axles to get the GVWR. if you've only were given one axle, the GAWR and GVWR may be the same.
Learn more about boat's capacity plate here : brainly.com/question/27883467
SPJ4
Best answer: B. A state is sued for intentionally creating a Congressional district with a majority African-American population.
Background/context:
The landmark case regarding voting district lines was <em>Baker v. Carr </em>(1962), which pertained to voting districts in Tennessee. The plaintiff, Charles Baker, argued that voting districts, which had not been redrawn since 1901, heavily favored rural locations over urban centers which had grown significantly since then. Joe Carr was Secretary of State for Tennessee at the time, so was named in the case in regard to voting district lines as drawn by the state legislature. The Supreme Court ruled that voting districts were not merely a political matter to be decided by legislatures, but that they were subject to review by federal courts to determine their fairness.
The matter of redrawing district lines has come up in court cases recently as some state legislatures, when dominated by one political party, have "gerrymandered" district lines to try to maintain continued prominence for their party. Legislatures dominated by one party may redraw district lines (following the US Census) in ways that favor their party's candidates maintaining an advantage. Earlier this year, lawsuits were filed against the states of Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana, accusing those states of trying to isolate African-American voters to limit their impact on Congressional elections. According to <em>Courthouse News Service </em>(June 14, 2018), "In Georgia, Alabama and Louisiana, local lawyers filed lawsuits in federal court against each states’ Secretary of States ... alleging the Republican efforts in 2011 to redraw congressional lines left many of the minority black voters packed into one district and breaking up pockets of others."
The word from the selection that shows a triumphant tone is prevail.
